Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place. If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom, then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.
See you inside.
The Arbtalk Team
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.
Question
neiln
I unfortunately have an ongoing issue with subsidence caused by shrinkage of desiccated clay soil as a result of mature Oak trees in 2 neighbouring properties. My house insurance is being of limited value and I'm seeking some advice on the legal position and possible ways to resolve this. I'd prefer not to put details on the forum though, if anyone would be willing to offer some advice by private messaging that would be a great help. Thank you
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
2
11
3
Popular Days
Sep 15
13
Sep 16
7
May 31
2
Sep 17
1
Top Posters For This Question
Khriss 2 posts
kevinjohnsonmbe 2 posts
neiln 11 posts
Wedgebanger 3 posts
Popular Days
Sep 15 2019
13 posts
Sep 16 2019
7 posts
May 31 2022
2 posts
Sep 17 2019
1 post
Popular Posts
kevinjohnsonmbe
It is ENCOURAGING to hear that an insurance company ISN’T making an immediate and unfounded decision to seek tree removal based upon the trees being the presumed cause without any substantial evidenc
neiln
drains were cctv'ed. minor misalignments of clay pipe not thought to be a problem but sleeved anyway...damage continues years on. ITS THE F*****G TREES GUYS, really, it is!
Khriss
I normally charge for such. I also get a lot of these complaints on my desk. One in Ten has grounds for tree work ( the tree is the culprit) the rest are spurious chancer claims. The evidence needed f
25 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now