Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

house damaged by subsidence caused by neighbours trees


neiln
 Share

Question

I unfortunately have an ongoing issue with subsidence caused by shrinkage of desiccated clay soil as a result of mature Oak trees in 2 neighbouring properties. My house insurance is being of limited value and I'm seeking some advice on the legal position and possible ways to resolve this.  I'd prefer not to put details on the forum though, if anyone would be willing to offer some advice  by private messaging that would be a great help.  Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

They aren't sorting it.  Over a decade in and they are sitting in there hands with neighbours not cooperating and my house surveying further damage.  That's why I'm seeking some advice.  Just realised I probably posted this in the wrong sub forum though.  The advice I need is about legal avenues and likely success or not, for forcing the trees to be removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I normally charge for such. I also get a lot of these complaints on my desk. One in Ten has grounds for tree work ( the tree is the culprit) the rest are spurious chancer claims. The evidence needed for the result 'you want' is substantial and maybe why the insurance company is dragging its feet. K

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • -1

It is ENCOURAGING to hear that an insurance company ISN’T making an immediate and unfounded decision to seek tree removal  based upon the trees being the presumed cause without any substantial evidence to support such an assumption. 

 

Not good for for OPs peace of mind though. 

 

What basis is there to assume trees are the cause and that removal (of somebody else’s property) will solve the problem?

 

Starting point might be exploratory digs to ascertain which, if any, roots are in the vicinity of foundations. 

 

When you have demonstrated what is present it might be possible to start forming opinions on likelihood of any contribution to assumed subsidence. 

 

Look at it the other way....

 

You:  I think your property is damaging my property so I want you to pay to remove it. 

 

Me:  What evidence do you have to support this request?

 

You: Err, none but it’s trees - they cause subsidence. 

 

Me:  Err, OK, good day. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Done, test pits, bore holes, shown decicated soil, tree roots found, evidence presented to neighbours who have still refused to cooperate. Insurance now sat on there hands for 3+ years. I've got another complaint in which will go to financial ombudsman shortly. I need to work out what the compensation I said seek is, and I know I need to speak to a solicitor but was asking here if anyone could advise what the questions he should consider are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Fair play for extra info ??

 

You have the inalienable right to self help abatement of an actionable nuisance. 

 

Have you considered initiating the self help (or getting the indicative costs thereof) and then presenting that as the starting point for restitution if that’s the route you want to take. 

 

You'd have to be sufficiently confidant that the results of your investigations to date wouldn’t be successfully challenged. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yes soil was tested by insurers, yes it's shrinkable. Yes the roots found were tested and id'd as the same species as the suspect trees, no there are no other of that species.

I'm not going to discuss what I think of the reason for lack of action by the insurer.  

Monitoring, yes, lots, years and years.  We know the cause, we really do.

 

What do you mean by self help in this case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Soil dessication aint sometimes caused by the nearest tree. Drains are 'my'  usual suspect. Soil washout or pooling that encourages root extension. New developments 'should' sleeve drains. But without detail on yr property mate-this is all just speculation. K

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.