Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, nepia said:

I'm not trying to fall out with you, honest guv, but again I disagree.  Staff could have demanded verification of name and address; if refused call Old Bill - that refusal would be prima facie evidence of dishonesty.

Most for courts have cctv and can get number plates . Not a big deal I don't think .

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 hour ago, nepia said:

I'm not trying to fall out with you, honest guv, but again I disagree.  Staff could have demanded verification of name and address; if refused call Old Bill - that refusal would be prima facie evidence of dishonesty.

Don't worry about falling out, seriously, I'm not Labour / Momentum...  It really IS OK to have a discussion and start with differing points of view.  I prefer it that way (as Eggs would say - I could have an argument in phonebook (esp if the phone was disconnected)). Way I see it is there's little point having a discussion with someone that agrees...  It would just be a nodding session ?

 

In the case of the miscreant diner, staff could have "asked" for verification of name and address, they could also "demand" it - but that's not to say there is any obligation upon the miscreant diner to provide it.  Anyone can "ask" whatever they like, even the Rozzers can't "demand" information (except in very limited and well defined situations) and they become even further denuded after arrest (if that is the way things progress.)  

 

People, generally, are far too compliant with pseudo authority that seeks to exert powers they do not inherently have.  

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

In the case of the miscreant diner, staff could have "asked" for verification of name and address, they could also "demand" it - but that's not to say there is any obligation upon the miscreant diner to provide it.  Anyone can "ask" whatever they like, even the Rozzers can't "demand" information (except in very limited and well defined situations) and they become even further denuded after arrest (if that is the way things progress.)  

 

People, generally, are far too compliant with pseudo authority that seeks to exert powers they do not inherently have.  

The best thing they could have done is offer him a free dessert, and mix a turd in the chocolate sauce :birthday:

  • Haha 3
Posted
27 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

 (as Eggs would say - I could have an argument in phonebook (esp if the phone was disconnected)).

 

Too true, then when ya get on the phone and I explain to you the error of your ways the penny drops in to the disconnected phone, yet you still keep coming back for more. when will you ever learn?

Posted
1 hour ago, eggsarascal said:

Too true, then when ya get on the phone and I explain to you the error of your ways the penny drops in to the disconnected phone, yet you still keep coming back for more. when will you ever learn?

Have you got that the right way round me ol’ Scrambled Egg??

Posted
On 26/09/2019 at 14:59, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Quite right to, a perfectly reasonable action on your part. Where on earth did the store clerk think they had suddenly gained the power to detain you?

They probably do not have the power to detain anyone who has made an innocent mistake... but the request is valid... and all too often confused by most decent people to be an actual obligation.

 

I strongly recommend the Utube vids from Crimbodge , I have recently discovered his channel and its very entertaining ...He is sooo pissed with the police , but for good reason IMO from what he broadcasts.. its very educational about our rights, I have learnt a lot from his videos that would help in situations like this.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Woodlover said:

They probably do not have the power to detain anyone who has made an innocent mistake... but the request is valid... and all too often confused by most decent people to be an actual obligation.

 

I strongly recommend the Utube vids from Crimbodge , I have recently discovered his channel and its very entertaining ...He is sooo pissed with the police , but for good reason IMO from what he broadcasts.. its very educational about our rights, I have learnt a lot from his videos that would help in situations like this.

 

 

Seen some of them and agreed, he’s got a fair chip on both shoulders ?

 

Careful referencing YouTube as a source though, Vesp used to get a (often justifiable) lashing for leaning heavily upon a single source ??

Posted (edited)

Well. When you have the computing power of SkyLab in the palm of yr hand these days - its easy to get carried away... K

Edited by Khriss
Obvs using it to talk informed sense rather than absolute bollocks is the real trick here.....!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.