Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, AJStrees said:

Yes that's right. The bars it comes with are 1.5 metres long, I got some steel 3 metres long to do longer but not so heavy logs. Its okay. But I would much prefer a logosol F2. If you have time and a good spot to sit it, then it works alright. It is a little bit toy really, I have tried to get to like it, but for heavy timber its really not what you need. 

@AJStreesCheers for the honest review.  I'll save my $

It doesn't seem to do much that I can't do with trestles and the panthermill.

I had an Logosol M8 and would love to get an F2+ with it's portability and to have the ability to  make that first cut and mill so easily... ***dreams of Logosol**** 

  • Like 3

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bob_z_l said:

@AJStreesCheers for the honest review.  I'll save my $

It doesn't seem to do much that I can't do with trestles and the panthermill.

I had an Logosol M8 and would love to get an F2+ with it's portability and to have the ability to  make that first cut and mill so easily... ***dreams of Logosol**** 

Yeah the one good thing is the use of a rail system which does take a lot of effort out of the milling. But its a little quirky. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Bob_z_l said:

@AJStreesCheers for the honest review.  I'll save my $

It doesn't seem to do much that I can't do with trestles and the panthermill.

I had an Logosol M8 and would love to get an F2+ with it's portability and to have the ability to  make that first cut and mill so easily... ***dreams of Logosol**** 

One for sale at the moment but asking to much for it but that is my opinion 

Posted
Why couldn't it work with the two chinese saw heads?



I’m sure they could have but when they arrived it turned out there was no CE marking, sound or vibration output data and the owners manual was a photocopy of the Stihl 661 manual minus the logos and data...funnily enough they didn’t even edit the manual from referring to the saw as a 661?

There was no way I could let an employee be on the other end of the mill and to be honest I’m fairly keen on minimising my exposure to completely untested machinery too!
Posted
4 minutes ago, AndyO said:

 

 


I’m sure they could have but when they arrived it turned out there was no CE marking, sound or vibration output data and the owners manual was a photocopy of the Stihl 661 manual minus the logos and data...funnily enough they didn’t even edit the manual from referring to the saw as a 661?

There was no way I could let an employee be on the other end of the mill and to be honest I’m fairly keen on minimising my exposure to completely untested machinery too!

 

 

Fair enough... :thumbup1:

  • Like 1
Posted

To cap off a perfect day in the woods I’m going to use my modern ‘longbow’ and sought some bunnies out.2fb719da0eb2f8c56d5c5d97b4df077e.jpg

Nice looking long bow. Poor bunnies. Lol!
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.