Potus ???

[Yournamehere]

4 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Isn't it a bit early to be clutching you're pearls and trying to imply sexism.

 

Nope, I'm an equal opportunity hater of everyone that are as thick as mince.

 

Seeing as the twitter post was about playing an echo and the bunny men LP,  mono/stereo might actually be important but no, the lefty has to be offended on someone else's behalf.

 

Are you now going to go through you list of ism & ist allegations, next you'll be puffing up your chest saying it's be because she's African/Indian, nope just thick.

Whilst we're on the subject as thick as mince, try looking back beyond the E&tB mock up that I did to see the original post.

I don't wear pearls, I don't clutch what I don't wear, I'm not offended, no, no I won't be, no she isn't, you are a moron.

Peace & love 

Yourn

[GarethM]

Wtf are you blabbering on about.

 

She makes Angela Rayner look like Magnus Magnuson.

 

Every interview Kamala has done pretty much sounds like it was written by the mythical room full of monkeys, she may one day do one that sounds like Shakespeare but the bookies aren't going to be taking odds on that happening.

 

Peace and love my arse, it's up there with empty platitudes of have a nice day at the supermarket.

[Yournamehere]

Sorry, I missed, 'Isn't it a bit early to be clutching you're pearls'.

Which, erm, makes you look like like... 

Peace & love your arse.

Yourn

[GarethM]

3 minutes ago, Yournamehere said:

Sorry, I missed, 'Isn't it a bit early to be clutching you're pearls'.

Which, erm, makes you look like like... 

Peace & love your arse.

Yourn

Well what analogue would you like instead of pearl clutching ?.

 

I'm guessing your a self identifying "progressive" type, as your happy to throw around the ism & ist accusations in some battle of fakery virtue signalling to the other eunuch peacock.

 

Probably whilst shouting silence is violence.

[Yournamehere]

3 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Well what analogue would you like instead of pearl clutching ?.

 

I'm guessing your a self identifying "progressive" type, as your happy to throw around the ism & ist accusations in some battle of fakery virtue signalling to the other eunuch peacock.

 

Probably whilst shouting silence is violence.

analogue? what as opposed to digital? or do you mean analogy?

I self identify as nothing: I am Nemo.

Here though your  'you're' would have been correct: the rest is just a nonsensical word salad.

Not your day is it?

[GarethM]

It's a term used in science, similar but not the same as you didn't like clutching pearls and you've no balls to clutch.

 

"a compound with a molecular structure closely similar to that of another."

[Yournamehere]

3 minutes ago, GarethM said:

It's a term used in science, similar but not the same as you didn't like clutching pearls and you've no balls to clutch.

 

"a compound with a molecular structure closely similar to that of another."

Oh my god!!! It's you!!! You're the one that hides in my bathroom!

 

[GarethM]

Just now, Yournamehere said:

Oh my god!!! It's you!!! You're the one that hides in my bathroom!

Sadly for you, that's just the mirror and your reflection.

[Mick Dempsey]

6 hours ago, peds said:

I keep seeing about JD Vance and a couch, but I can never get to the bottom of it.

What is it all about?

[peds]

There was a funny rumour going around that JD and his friends in college, I think, either as a group or individually in private, but together... if you see what I mean? ... put a latex glove between two couch cushions and, err, simulated coitus with it to completion. And there doesn't seem to be much truth behind it, but then an article appeared in maybe the New York Times, somewhere towards the back, unseen, explaining why it was nonsense... and JD's team then demanded a retraction and apology for that article, making it look like they were taking issue with the idea that it never happened... suggesting to the whole wide world, therefore, that it did. 

 

So it was a non-story about some daft thing that may or may not have happened in the murky past of someone's younger years, and really, who gives a ****************... but it was then dealt with in the wrong way, and it grew legs, and is now working hard to sink Trump’s presidential campaign. A bit of a Streisand Effect sort of thing.

 

Some of the details above may be misremembered, and I'd recommend you seek clarification from a stronger source if the story interests you, but like I said... who really gives a ****************?