Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Retired Climber

Member
  • Posts

    802
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Retired Climber

  1. If that tree is 35 ft high the picture is very misleading. I would say the foundations have much bigger problems than the tree.
  2. We obviously can't give a professional opinion based on a couple of photos. What I would say is that if that was my house I wouldn't be worried about that tree in the slightest
  3. It need not be expensive, but you should find someone who knows what they are doing. A lot of people call themselves tree surgeons, with not much more than a few NPTC certificates by way of qualifications. It's a very quick job for someone who will quickly understand the problem, and then do the necessary.
  4. What's at the bottom of the tree? Is it planted in a gap in paving?
  5. A perfect.demonstration of the fact that you can only dumb something down so much, before it becomes of no use to anyone. Blockchain tech is complicated by it's very nature, but we don't actually need to understand how it works. The general public aren't supposed to understand cryptocurrency, and there is very little benefit to doing so. Just treat investing in such things in the same way as you would bet on a horse, and you won't go too far wrong. Following the gambling theme, anyone who claims to be an expert, with the ability to advise others how to make money from it, is a charlatan.
  6. Because he didn't think it through. Let it go man, you are like a dog with a bone. 😀
  7. I normally just bang the logs together as I pick them up. Anything that can hold on tight enough not to fall off is welcomed into the house.
  8. The only time this place is busy is when there's an argument going on. If it were not for the small group of very prolific posters, there would be nothing new to read.
  9. I wouldn't call it a traditional zero sum game, but agree that it can be seen in that way. If so, it's an excellent reason to look after you and yours, and stop worrying too much about the wider problems. I don't agree that we need to sacrifice the majority to look after ourselves. Often money is made by those who offer the best value to the majority. Fuel costs will be a problem for the poor, I agree. However, my comment was really aimed at members here. If your truck and saws are costing more in fuel, so are those of every other arb.
  10. That's because it's easier to winge and moan like a little girl about inflation, Brexit, Covid, the government etc, than realise that you need to look after yourself. The rising cost of living is a difficult situation for some, but many seem to think that fantasising about the lower classes somehow rising up, and taking power from the elite is a good use of their time. Whilst the natural born victims are moaning, people are making money out of the situation. You can decide yourself if you want to be a victim or an opportunist. Most aspects of the cost of living 'crisis' aren't a problem anyway. Problems only occur when something happens that puts you at a disadvantage. The cost of fuel has gone up for everyone; so nobody is disadvantaged. On the rare occasion they are, it's due to the fact that they have formerly been leveraging a fuel dependent advantage. Money is there for the taking, for anyone willing to go and get it.
  11. You don't need to put up and shut up. It has literally, never in the history of humanity, been so easy to make money. Money is just a token we all use to play a game. Obviously some people are better at the game than others, but anyone can do well.
  12. We are nowhere near hyper inflation. I think it has to be 50 % per month or 1000% per year. Figures may not be accurate, but you get the idea.
  13. This, in my opinion, is the best answer. The government inject a load of QE money into the economy, which makes the money you have less rare, so less powerful.
  14. I don't think it's for a Master's level course. Thinking back to my own post grad courses, I needed quite a decent level of ability to design and execute research in order to pass the course. What we've seen here would be laughed at, even at Prof Cert / Prof Dip level.
  15. I deliberately avoided that particular can of worms and just concentrated on the question asked.
  16. Everyone has a contract. However, I agree that it's unlikely that this would be covered. It's the easiest way to avoid any ambiguity should the situation arise though. Personally, I'd let common sense prevail. If the freelancer does something daft, they pay, if an employee does something daft, the employer pays. If nobody does anything daft and something is damaged anyway, maybe 50 / 50. The only rule really is that an employee never pays, as that's a can of worms and a half (especially if they are earning close to minimum wage).
  17. It's entirely down to the contract between the freelancer and the business. As the freelancer is not an employee, employment law does not apply; as both parties are businesses, consumer law does not apply. The answer will be in the contract. What 'usually' happens is of little relevance.
  18. That's a bit ageist. I can be just a crap with a load of shiny kit as with a length of old rope and a couple of prussick loops.
  19. I chose to pick up on the technical issues rather than the English as I presumed that it had been written by a foreign student. I always give a bit of slack to anyone not using their first language, as my own foreign language skills are embarrassingly low.
  20. That survey will give you very little useful data. It seems like you are 'going through the motions' rather than actually trying to get useful responses. I'd expect a much more polished survey for a Masters course. Several of the questions lead the respondent, some of the options are very limiting, and the ratio of qualitative to quantitative questioning is poor. Sorry to be negative, but if you are going to get responses you need to make sure they will be useful, significant and genuine.
  21. Accounting and business are very different things. Obviously we don't know exactly what type of assistance the OP requires, but I can't think of any circumstances in which I would take business advice from my accountants.
  22. That's easy; because he's an accountant.
  23. We should probably agree to disagree. I was going to use the point that 2 blokes can take 600 quid a day as a point to bolster my own argument. Doing those sort of jobs needs nothing more than a cheap truck, a ladder, a couple of hedge cutters and a blower. I don't think the bloke on the hedge had a helmet and I reckon PPE, method statements and risk assessments might be a bit thin on the ground too. I mean no disrespect to the OP, but if 2 unskilled labourers can consistently bring in 600 quid a day I think they are doing alright. I take your point regarding my pricing knowledge being a little out of date. I started charging £275 quid a day for a two man team.

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.