trigger_andy

To think this guy actually believes new outlets are the sources and not reporting on what the source reveal. This is the problem on the left when they have room temperature IQ drones blindly swallowing everything they read.

You're no wrong about this one @Johnsond Big J must be shaking his head in despair about having this level of back up.

Name one then. 🤷🏻‍♂️

The Libtards do not need facts. They thrive off of feelings and "sources". They'll never actually link to the sources and you'd be a fool if you do not believe them "because Orange Man bad!".

No

Oh, and still waiting on any form of evidence other than News reports. Surely you're not this easily manipulated these days J?

You know you've lost the argument J when you bring Nazi Germany into the equation. I know you've studiously avoided mentioning Naziism and instead use a date to mean the same thing but not seem like you've actually referring to Naziisim but the intention is clearly there. We are at polar opposites, as per usual but I respect your polite replies. Everything you claim I suffer from I see you suffering from but from a left leaning perspective. You and your foot lackies seem utterly blind to the failings of the Dems in the US and Labour in the UK. We've not discussed Sweden for a good while but the left leaning policies have all but destroyed the country. Im coming to that conclusion from sitting on a Norwegian Oil Rig working with Swedish lads and Norwegians living in Sweden looking to move back. And please, dont tell me what I believe. Perhaps suggest in your opinion this is what I believe. It shifts the perspective somewhat. Your opinion on what I believe are way off the mark as I believe your opinions of the US electorate to be just as poorly judged.

So you and J are utterly unable to provide any evidence other than "trust me bro!" Thats the hill you're gonna die on?

So you formed your opinion based on an article? Bless.

What bribe did he accept? Can you link us to the evidence you yourself have reviewed? Should be an easy task since you hold such conviction, you must have read the source material, correct? Please tell me you've read the source material and not the "news report"?

Its an addictive pull. I'll try to behave.

You wish it was not the case. But what are the FBI saying? You know, the actual organization that carried out this sting? Or are we just to go with "news reports? Can you link to the record that shows he accepted this bribe? What position did he hold at the time?

So the outgoing Biden controlled FBI can be relied upon but the incoming Trump controlled FBI cant be relied upon. Surly you can see the hypocrisy here. An entrapment attempt that according to the FBI failed. Which according to the FBI themselves he passed. Correct, nothing more than deranged liberal hyperbolic Ecco chamber in full effect.

Interesting quote, ""You had FBI agents going undercover to try and entrap one of the president's top allies and supporters, someone who they knew very well would be taking a government position." Also directly from the very same FBI, "current FBI Director Kash Patel had ordered an investigation into the matter, which "found zero evidence of illegal activity or criminal wrongdoing". Seems like the outgoing Biden ran FBI tried to entrap, failed and the incoming FBI said there is no case to answer. Seems like politcal games that failed. Its a non-story coming from the FBI themselves.

Interesting statement from Harris when she was running for POTUS. Maddow, who is openly gay herself, appeared pained by Harris’s statement that Buttigieg ‘would have been an ideal partner – if I were a straight white man.’ The tolerant left are homophobic? Who'd have thought? Rachel Maddow questions Kamala Harris about her Buttigieg remark - Internewscast Journal INTERNEWSCAST.COM Rachel Maddow pressed Kamala Harris about the former vice president's claims in her book regarding the potential 2024 campaign ticket with Pete Buttigieg,

Any evidence of this J? What office did he hold at the time? Who was the POTUS at the time?

Great recap Andrew. Yes, you've gotta work with the tools you've got. Yes, been away for a while. Lost interest in all the bitching. I'll try to stick to the milling forums more. I've often done what you suggest, noodle the 30" logs down to a rough cant to get on my wee Logosol. Square it, then slab it. The center 6 slabs will be a mix of rift and quater sawn and if you wanted just 10" wide slabs just turn these 6 slabs upright on the bandsaw and cut in half. Id prefer keeping them 20", can always cut in half later if needed. My hope is to have saved enough by the end of the year to afford a Logosol B1001. That should get me an 800mm cant. Where abouts in Scotland are you?

PM'd you.

Obviously if you saw the log with a bandsaw and box the heart in you'll end up with three slabs that are quarter sawn and then some rift sawn either side of this then the upper and lower slabs will be plain sawn. If you're getting a lot of oak passing through this is by far the best option timewise.

Deffo mill it. What have you got to lose?

Cat got your tongue, boy? You're suddenly quite shy?

People seem to confuse the US first amendment with our own laws because they are so closely aligned.

Is it ok to promote violence against someone being in the right place? Instructions unclear.

We were discussing what comeback you could possibly front. But nobody had an image of beer. In many circles that could be considered an admission of deferral. A form of surrender. Would you like to clarify why you refuse to engage in a discussion revolving around free speech when it involves you personally? Again, is free speech dead?

Interestingly I’ve had the ban hammer dropped on me here more than anyone. A significant portion of those bans has been responding and repeating your own claims of SA and referring to and voicing an opinion on pictures you posted up of your own council flat. No one is allowed to post thoughts openly. You know this more than anyone Komrad.