Paul Cleaver
-
Posts
1,959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by Paul Cleaver
-
nice legs one the chick far left
-
But not the tree owner? Your friend might be liable if there is nothing in the contract stating they will gain permission for work on trees owns by 3rd parties
-
Imagine there is no tree of heaven, its easy if you try.
-
+ cats make a big impact on small bird populations
-
All the best m8
-
HI Mr S, If you have relocated, surely you have kept some core regular customers. Any jobs from these can be pooled together, and add B&B costs?
-
Hebe might do well here, there a quite a few different types with different max heights -
Anyone know this one please?
Paul Cleaver replied to kev7937's topic in Tree Identification pictures
sea buckthorn ? -
fell for me too
-
I would think the wages of CEOs in the above sector would have to increase to compete with CEOs in the private sector, otherwise they would just leave to work in the private sector ?
-
Or instead of raising the minimum wage and possibly increasing inflation, they should be using money to help the buying of houses more affordable. The country is we are stuck in maelstrom with no way out.
-
Not a big political aficionado at all but it seems the government seems to cleverly weave political ideologies to suit themselves without being pigeon holed. I think over the last couple of decades with the help of technology, they have more control over our lives. In particular the Brexit scandal, we have moved closer to communism.
-
just reaching for the popcorn
-
Chalara fraxinea - Generic thread
Paul Cleaver replied to David Humphries's topic in Tree health care
I have BA in Geology Gary ………..Bugger all -
To all music aficionados who get bogged down with the chaos of politics and life in general. Well we have our release. I pity those who don't.
-
love it
-
Chalara fraxinea - Generic thread
Paul Cleaver replied to David Humphries's topic in Tree health care
I will be shortly survey trees railside mainly in the South. I expect I will be quite busy. I am expecting some areas where "clumps" (for want of a better word), of ash trees may need felling. If this is the case I will have to determine whether immediate replanting should take place on banked areas to avoid landslip! -
No I haven't Garry sounds like I should - thanks for the imput
-
sounds great
-
Oh yes
-
Ok @EdwardC and @Gary Prentice I see what you are saying. Based on previous cases (which set a precedence for new similar cases ) is seems the law is unfair but a necessary evil with report writing. I have a question. In the terms of reference of a tree report, It could go something like this. "I have been asked by Mr ****** of ****** ****** ******* ***** to inspect the trees on his property and report on their condition, and give recommendations of any works regarded as 1 Necessary to ensure the continuing health of the trees. 2.In the interests of Health and Safety. 3. In the interests of good Arboricultural practice. So the terms of reference should instead be worded how.
-
Thought of you guys down south Brain Illness Carried By Ticks Discovered At Two Locations In England For The First Time - LADbible WWW.LADBIBLE.COM Public Health England has confirmed tick-borne encephalitis in two locations
-
When you say "useage" does that cover all potential targets such as a static inanimate object?
-
Quote - I suggest you don't wait to explain it to that expensive barrister. Best not to give them a helping hand and avoid using high risk when you mean high usage. I didn't say it was high risk? Anyway lets pretend I did!! High usage is a factor which could make it high risk the way I look at it. I wouldn't need to explain this to a barrister regarding this inclusion debate as would have reduced the risk by advising reduction. I put it to you Mr C that although you agree that including unions are a defect, you would be expecting the court to believe, if the inclusion fails, that this was an act of god!! "At this point the court erupts" "ORDER ORDER" exclaimed the Judge
-
Quote -Completely meaningless, and would certainly cause problems for you in your hypothetical court case. I would explain in more detail in a real court case. Quote-I suspect you are talking about usage, or 'target' value, of a particular area or zone, or at least you should be. Cant fault you on the above Quotation Quote-How do you reduce the level of risk to a high risk area posed by a tree tree that is well adapted to its location, without any defects, and not likely to fail before the next inspection. Are you suggesting that included bark is not a defect in trees? If so, then I disagree. If this is a general statement, then get back on topic as its irrelevant in this thread. Can you please explain what a tree tree is? I do feel a little let down by your grammar Mr C.
