Making the news today....

[manco]

11 minutes ago, Mike Hill said:

 

Here I was ,earnestly hoping you would be lucid by this evening...

Edited 7 hours ago by manco

[Mark J]

Nigel Farage backtracks on Reform UK’s promise to cut £90bn of taxes claiming proposal had been an ‘aspiration’.

Nigel Farage backtracks on Reform UK’s promise to cut £90bn of taxes | Reform UK | The Guardian

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

---

Party leader says proposal had been an ‘aspiration’ and accuses Tories and Labour of ‘wrecking the public finances’

 

[sime42]

 

 

10 hours ago, Johnsond said:

Did I say it was ?? I said to wait, did I not ??
 Don’t start the day off with lies and wild leftard nonsense now bonny lad 

 

 

Bullshit. We all know what you were insinuating. You were wrong about the Southport incident, and probably wrong again this time. 

The speed with which you post these things up after the event every time is indecent. Just trying to make political capital from tragedy. It's not hard to see what kinds of people you want the perpetrators to be, and their motivations. What's not clear is whether or not you actually believe the disinformation that you post on here sometimes, or you're just propagating it to incite division and hatred.

 

 

[Johnsond]

28 minutes ago, sime42 said:

 

 

 

 

Bullshit. We all know what you were insinuating. You were wrong about the Southport incident, and probably wrong again this time. 

The speed with which you post these things up after the event every time is indecent. Just trying to make political capital from tragedy. It's not hard to see what kinds of people you want the perpetrators to be, and their motivations. What's not clear is whether or not you actually believe the disinformation that you post on here sometimes, or you're just propagating it to incite division and hatred.

 

 

 Nearly a full house of Leftards. 
That post looks like it was written by a 6th form socialist warrior. 
How was I wrong about Southport 42 ?? How can I be wrong when I said wait and see what the motive is ! you fool, stick to facts don’t let your emotions get the better of you, it’s often the best way. 
You are of course entitled to your opinions but they are exactly that “ opinions “ not facts. 
Truthfully Id rather there not be perpetrators, unfortunately historically the facts show it is one group that favours such tactics. You obviously dont like that being pointed out but it doesn’t change the facts of the matter. 
 

 

 

Edited 6 hours ago by Johnsond

[Mark J]

23 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

How can I be wrong when I said wait and see what the motive is ! you fool, stick to facts don’t let your emotions get the better of you, it’s often the best way

Lol.

[Johnsond]

9 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Lol.

I know it’s hard defending the indefensible all the time especially when it’s so easy to put up “ facts and statistics “ to counter your shite, that and the propensity for certain illegal immigrant groups to commit a disproportionate amount of sexual offences but really Mark you have to try a bit harder than that. 

[Mark J]

10 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

I know it’s hard defending the indefensible all the time especially when it’s so easy to put up “ facts and statistics “ to counter your shite, that and the propensity for certain illegal immigrant groups to commit a disproportionate amount of sexual offences but really Mark you have to try a bit harder than that. 

Ha, you quite literally just asked me to post some facts up on another thread. 

You are tapped,

Good night.

ROFL.

[AHPP]

16 hours ago, Mike Hill said:

 

This is a very peculiar argument that I dont think is as simple as " let females carry guns in order to keep them safe".

 

I am not picking an argument but stating a fact. I dont know how many people are authorised to carry outside the mil or police but it is a surprising number that has actually grown since the end of " the troubles".

 

According to a gunsmith I know who services people's personal weapons on occasion. 

 

I've been puzzling over your first post all day. It was somewhere between trying to have an argument where there wasn't one and, "He can't have read it right."

 

But whatever. Moving on. An increase from 0.009% to 0.011% doesn't matter. 100% of people who want to carry, should be able to. And it really is as simple as let females carry guns in order to keep them safe. If you disagree, I'd put you to sitting down with distraught rape victims and comforting them with the silver lining that their rapes were at least lesser (positivistic) crimes than the one of carrying a piece of iron that only harms criminals. Until you changed your mind or starved to death, whichever comes first.

 

It is utterly indefensible to deny the weaker sex the means to go about life freely.

Edited 6 hours ago by AHPP

[sime42]

31 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

 Nearly a full house of Leftards. 
That post looks like it was written by a 6th form socialist warrior. 
How was I wrong about Southport 42 ?? How can I be wrong when I said wait and see what the motive is ! you fool, stick to facts don’t let your emotions get the better of you, it’s often the best way. 
You are of course entitled to your opinions but they are exactly that “ opinions “ not facts. 
Truthfully Id rather there not be perpetrators, unfortunately historically the facts show it is one group that favours such tactics. You obviously dont like that being pointed out but it doesn’t change the facts of the matter. 
 

 

 

 

You Muppet.

 

I've never seen anyone so adept at digging themselves into a hole. And then keep digging. And digging. And digging. 

 

The sick, evil, ****************ed up excuse for a human that was responsible for the Southport killings wasn't actually an immigrant, or a Muslim. Also, as heinous as it was, the crime wasn't categorised as a terror attack at sentencing. The guy is just a sick, evil, ****************ed up excuse for a human who has an obsession with extreme violence. 

Why did you think he was an immigrant, and a Muslim? You got caught out by that BS disinformation at the time, or you just blindly parroted it to stoke division and hatred. I'm not sure which is worse. 

 

There might be some interesting statistics in this report if you could read it. 

 

Who do Britons hold responsible for the Southport attack? | YouGov

YOUGOV.CO.UK

---

The public tend not to see the stabbings as an act of terrorism

 

 

 

[Johnsond]

24 minutes ago, sime42 said:

 

You Muppet.

 

I've never seen anyone so adept at digging themselves into a hole. And then keep digging. And digging. And digging. 

 

The sick, evil, ****************ed up excuse for a human that was responsible for the Southport killings wasn't actually an immigrant, or a Muslim. Also, as heinous as it was, the crime wasn't categorised as a terror attack at sentencing. The guy is just a sick, evil, ****************ed up excuse for a human who has an obsession with extreme violence. 

Why did you think he was an immigrant, and a Muslim? You got caught out by that BS disinformation at the time, or you just blindly parroted it to stoke division and hatred. I'm not sure which is worse. 

 

There might be some interesting statistics in this report if you could read it. 

 

Who do Britons hold responsible for the Southport attack? | YouGov

YOUGOV.CO.UK

---

The public tend not to see the stabbings as an act of terrorism

 

 

 

Facts 42 👍that’s your opinions again. You seem to be getting all wound  up lad. No one gets it like the leftards on here, “ if you could read it” 😞

Just curious why he was on the terror watchlist, and I presume you consider reading up on making poison and studying Al Queda terror manuals normal after school activities. But yeah in the end the CPS did take the political option  try much helped by his plea. 
Not sure if old two tier ever did do anything about it. 

After Rudakubana's guilty pleas, it emerged that he had a history of violent and concerning behaviour and had been referred to the Home Office anti-extremism programme Prevent three times between 2019 and 2021, but was not accepted into the scheme as no terrorist ideology was identified. Prime Minister Keir Starmerpromised to overhaul terrorism laws to include non-ideological acts of violence, and appointed David Anderson to lead a review of the Prevent programme

Edited 5 hours ago by Johnsond