Making the news today....

[tree-fancier123]

ah well if it takes our job, at least we can rely on Border Force if we need to score

[Steven P]

50 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Israel launches heavy bombardment on Gaza City as US says ceasefire holds

WWW.ALJAZEERA.COM

---

Netanyahu's decision to attack Gaza comes despite US-brokered ceasefire that came into effect on October 10.

 

 

I guess there is a different category for bombardment in a ceasefire?

[Steven P]

46 minutes ago, Mesterh said:

Taxis, buses, HGV, train, tram surely their cards are marked. Although after 9/11 auto planes where supposed to be the big thing but that never arose. Who knows what the next 10 years will bring. IIRC I read something that the MRNA stuff will soon make leylandii hedges only grow to 8 feet high and 4 feet wide! Bye bye bread and butter jobs.*

 

*  I might be making that bit up

 

 

 

Driverless trains and trams exist - though the London Mayor scrapped plans for the London Underground. Suspect that means 'paused'. Can't see a problem with driverless trains if they can prove the tech is reliable and secure - to be honest by the time say, a main line passenger train driver sees a problem they have passed it a mile ago. Not sure cars have the computing yet - too many other things to react to

[Johnsond]

Who woulda thunk it! 🫠 New study finds: CO2 as the main cause of global warming is "physically impossible" The CO2 Climate Narrative Collapses Under Basic Physics. Conclusion: CO2’s impact is… | Ian McCoy | 254 comments

WWW.LINKEDIN.COM

---

Who woulda thunk it! 🫠 New study finds: CO2 as the main cause of global warming is "physically...

🤷‍♂️

[Johnsond]

You can’t stop extremism until you stop hate washing extremists

APPLE.NEWS

---

History is full of clever people acting stupid by softening and sanitising the words of extremists.

 

[sime42]

19 hours ago, Johnsond said:

Who woulda thunk it! 🫠 New study finds: CO2 as the main cause of global warming is "physically impossible" The CO2 Climate Narrative Collapses Under Basic Physics. Conclusion: CO2’s impact is… | Ian McCoy | 254 comments

WWW.LINKEDIN.COM

---

Who woulda thunk it! 🫠 New study finds: CO2 as the main cause of global warming is "physically...

🤷‍♂️

 

Don't fall for another one Davey. That has all the hallmarks. "Science of Climate Change Journal " - really?

 

Did that seem like a neutral, considered post to you? The author sounds far from unbiased to me. You'd do well to read some of the comments on your LinxedIn stuff, to give yourself a chance at comprehension of the subject, before you stick it on here.

 

[Johnsond]

22 minutes ago, sime42 said:

 

Don't fall for another one Davey. That has all the hallmarks. "Science of Climate Change Journal " - really?

 

Did that seem like a neutral, considered post to you? The author sounds far from unbiased to me. You'd do well to read some of the comments on your LinxedIn stuff, to give yourself a chance at comprehension of the subject, before you stick it on here.

 

The condescending leftard prick gene is strong within you 42 on this topic very much like it was with Covid, like it is with illegal immigration, like it is with politics etc etc etc. 

What’s your enlightened take on this one then. Seeing as your comprehension is off the scale. I’ll not bother even posting the link to the illegal afghan that killed the innocent guy in the triple stabbing as all I’ll get is the standard “ Whataboutery “. 

🚨ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC CALL🚨 A London woman calls in and cries her eyes out in desperation "WE'RE NOT RACIST WE'RE PETRIFIED" "WHAT ARE THESE POLITICIANS DOING TO US. THEY'RE PUTTING EVERYONE IN… | João Neves

WWW.LINKEDIN.COM

---

🚨ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC CALL🚨 A London woman calls in and cries her eyes out in...

 

Edited 12 hours ago by Johnsond

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

The condescending prick gene is strong within you 42. 

How is it condescending to point out the truth? Has he hurt your feelings? 

[Steven P]

To be honest he has moved on now. Linkedin doesn't say how to respond to a critique so better move on to a new topic and hope no one notices there is no substance or knowledge behind the linkedin posts.

 

Though I am inclined to believe that the weight of science and worldwide research trumps a one off paper in an obscure publication. With these things always ask "what do the European, US and Russian scientists say"... and if all 3 sets tend to agree then I would go with that... and guess what... they all tend to agree with CO2 being a problem.

 

(I say the 3 sets because they spread the political spectrum and any commercial bias is equalised a bit)

[Johnsond]

37 minutes ago, Mark J said:

How is it condescending to point out the truth? Has he hurt your feelings? 

😂Not at all Mark, it’s all in the delivery, the Truth 🤔I forgot that’s something possessed only by an enlightened few. Good to see “ Stephen” confirm his status. 
You remember the predictions of the return of the ice age Mark and the rising sea levels ?? Did the O Zone later sort itself out by the way 🤔

Excuse my cynicism Mark but when there’s profit to be had you shouldn’t always follow the science 🤷‍♂️not that long ago some very eminent scientists were totally  cancelled for having an alternative view during the farce. 

Edited 10 hours ago by Johnsond