Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
9 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Yes, successfully. What of it? 

Nothing just asking seeing as you are asking personal questions about someone’s medical history. possibly a sign of what’s described below. 

 


Like depression and other mental illnesses, addiction is a very real medical disorder that is rooted in brain changes. Alcohol addiction is a complex disease with psychological, biological and social components, and like other chronic illnesses, addiction often involves cycles of relapse and remission

Posted
58 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Nothing just asking seeing as you are asking personal questions about someone’s medical history. possibly a sign of what’s described below. 

 


Like depression and other mental illnesses, addiction is a very real medical disorder that is rooted in brain changes. Alcohol addiction is a complex disease with psychological, biological and social components, and like other chronic illnesses, addiction often involves cycles of relapse and remission

You might be surprised, but I probably know a bit more about it than a snidey AI search.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Mark J said:

 

hmm - the video presenter and most of the comments are like ' no way would a 30-06 round not go right through - some even suggesting the guy on the roof was a cover for another shooter with a lower powered rifle

 

Martin Luther King was shot with the same calibre rifle and surgeons could feel the bullet inside him while they tried to save him

At 6:01 pm, just as King was leaning over the railing, he was shot by a .30-06 high-powered rifle. He fell backwards immediately. The bullet entered on the right side of his face and neck, and he began bleedThey were able to palpate the bullet in King's left back, just medial to his left scapula. ing profusely from the neck wound. Andrew Young was one of the first individuals to attend to King. He initially thought King was dead, but felt a pulse. As King lay bleeding on the second floor balcony of the motel, his head was placed on a pillow, his wound was covered with a towel, and a blanket was placed on his torso. He demonstrated some movement of his mouth, but he did not speak after the shooting and quickly lost consciousness.19

 

As the surgeons further explored the wound they could see that the bullet had injured the spine at the C7 and T1 vertebral levels. The spinal cord was also transected at that site. They were able to palpate the bullet in King's left back, just medial to his left scapula

Posted
9 hours ago, Mark J said:

You might be surprised, but I probably know a bit more about it than a snidey AI search.

 

I’m sure you do, don’t be a cheeky twat chipping in with comments about neurodivergence then Mark. 

Posted

It will be hard to see past the noise on this one as most people will disagree with it just because its come from RFK and Trump.

For me though it doesnt add up purely based on the fact that Paracetemol has been around for years, which doesn't account for the more recent increase in Autism

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

RFK Jr has pushed a discredited theory that routine vaccinations are responsible for rise in the diagnosis

 

  • Like 2
Posted
23 hours ago, tree-fancier123 said:

good point about the TV shows - see below, this SP fellow, never worked as a tree cutter, always offering pay related advice to those who do - personally I think SP needs need to be pulled apart by giant octopuses ( but I know it's wrong of me to think that)

and the 42, always rushes to help SP, not quite as bad as collaborating with the Nazis

 

 

 

Incorrect. Nothing to do with helping Stephen P, he doesn't require it. He clearly runs rings around your man JohnsonD every time, like most people in fact. Once you get past the dogma and bullying tactics, there's very little of any substance to actually counter, it's just BS to be called out. Any kind of semi-coherent, reasoned argument suffices. I think you have actually come to realise that yourself if you're candid about it.

The issue with the relentless BS is that what it lacks in substance, it more than makes up for in volume. It's easy to call it out, but nonetheless, it's slowly taking over the whole site. Can you justify all these 100's of screenshots of who's commented or reacted to which posts, that we've been inundated with recently, what's the point of it all? Do you honestly think it adds any value at all to the Arbtalk site? I don't. 
 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.