Making the news today....

[sime42]

1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

What you’re saying may well be true but that’s exactly the reaction those who made the documentary wanted to provoke. How easy it is proving in the internet /msm era to whip the gullible masses up eh 42, I guess the last few years have not yet taught you to question everything you are told in the media. Let the legal process follow its path, if he’s guilty then I’ve no doubt he will be in the shit big time. 

Which documentary?

[Johnsond]

18 minutes ago, sime42 said:

Which documentary?

What a tool you are 42, absolutely devoid of original thought, it must be right as it’s on the TV eh   🤷‍♂️

Edited September 18, 2023 by Johnsond

[sime42]

2 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

What a tool you are 42, absolutely devoid of original thought 🤷‍♂️

 

 

Eh, did I miss something?

[Mark J]

34 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Seriously Mark 🤷‍♂️

Yes, seriously. I suppose this and the XL Bully thing distracts many from the shady dealings of our current gov, and demise of the climate etc.,  but I genuinely don't understand which timings you are hinting at. Could you be a bit more clear? 

[Johnsond]

6 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Yes, seriously. I suppose this and the XL Bully thing distracts many from the shady dealings of our current gov, and demise of the climate etc.,  but I genuinely don't understand which timings you are hinting at. Could you be a bit more clear? 

Maté between yours and 42s message’s you’ve just made that oak resaw job I was putting off seem attractive. I should maybe thank you both 

[Steven P]

Obviously you have read something going on in the background to suggest that the timing of this documentary is related to something else - I haven't read that yet... so what did we miss in the background they 'they' are trying to hide?

 

 

('they' generally refers to a government, the New World Order, Tibetan monks, Lizards or alien overlords of course, and not a TV station and news paper with a story to tell and advertising to sell in time for a nice Christmas bonus)

[Johnsond]

3 hours ago, Steven P said:

Obviously you have read something going on in the background to suggest that the timing of this documentary is related to something else - I haven't read that yet... so what did we miss in the background they 'they' are trying to hide?

 

 

('they' generally refers to a government, the New World Order, Tibetan monks, Lizards or alien overlords of course, and not a TV station and news paper with a story to tell and advertising to sell in time for a nice Christmas bonus)

That’s you mind reading again it would seem. You are wasted here bud, I can see the headlines “ Mystic cuck” got to be a few quid in that game. 

 

[Johnsond]

I’d say Downing st should get on with the day job as quite frankly it is or at least should be a criminal matter. The fact the government of the day is commenting is utter bollocks when you see the real issues facing people on a day to day basis. 

[peds]

6 hours ago, Johnsond said:

What you’re saying may well be true but that’s exactly the reaction those who made the documentary wanted to provoke. How easy it is proving in the internet /msm era to whip the gullible masses up eh 42, I guess the last few years have not yet taught you to question everything you are told in the media. Let the legal process follow its path, if he’s guilty then I’ve no doubt he will be in the shit big time. 

 

So what you're saying is we aren't horrified by an act of rape, we are horrified by a picture someone drew of a rape?

[carlos]

is it not a matter for the police and courts?

seems a bit odd and worrying to make a tv program about it first.