Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
2 hours ago, doobin said:

Reverse drive, sideshift and top link on the joystick. Air conditioning and radio on. Luxury. 

IMG_3789.jpeg

So it's you to blame for those thorns in my dogs'paws

 

Lot's of phosphor compounds being recycled there, gorse grows at the sides of paths which have been fertilised regularly.

Posted
37 minutes ago, openspaceman said:

So it's you to blame for those thorns in my dogs'paws

 

Lot's of phosphor compounds being recycled there, gorse grows at the sides of paths which have been fertilised regularly.

We’ve actually cut and collected all the edges where we could, and pulled out the thicker gorse mechanically to get back to 12m firebreaks. The reverse flail was just to flatten out the pulled areas and get any bits sticking up so that we know the cut and collect will be fine to go over it all next year. 

81A8BA4B-E866-4030-B2BB-5EBF4BCBEA21.jpeg

IMG_3648.jpeg

e9f1245b-5b94-4f8b-9df8-6199e138f5ee.jpeg

81273120-4D22-4E2C-A6EC-853E550844E1.jpeg

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Are you allowed to burn on site etc?

 

Here the Wild life Trusts policy is  to remove all bigger stuff cut off site...or they are burning a  small amount on tin sheets then removing the ash.

 

They also have controlled fires to burn off the heather.

Edited by Stere
  • Confused 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Stere said:

Here the Wild life Trusts policy is  to remove all bigger stuff cut off site...or they are burning a  small amount on tin sheets then removing the ash.

 

This was always the policy locally post 1976 but seems to be abandoned now.

 

Since then of course much nitrogen has been added to the soil from vehicle exhausts, coupled with rich dog food it has led to an increase  in unwanted vegetation on the heath.

 

The obvious solution is cut and collect but the wildlife trusts will not grasp the nettle and find an off site solution. It was the days when common grazing removed these minerals (to be deposited on a home farm or abattoir) that formed these heaths.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, openspaceman said:

This was always the policy locally post 1976 but seems to be abandoned now.

 

Since then of course much nitrogen has been added to the soil from vehicle exhausts, coupled with rich dog food it has led to an increase  in unwanted vegetation on the heath.

 

The obvious solution is cut and collect but the wildlife trusts will not grasp the nettle and find an off site solution. It was the days when common grazing removed these minerals (to be deposited on a home farm or abattoir) that formed these heaths.

If all dog owners were to pick up their dog shit there wouldn’t be a problem then? If when house training puppies and they crap and/ or pee in the house some people rub the pups noses in it? If that was done to the owners who don’t pick the mess up maybe it would help train the owners🤔

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, dan blocker said:

If all dog owners were to pick up their dog shit there wouldn’t be a problem then? If when house training puppies and they crap and/ or pee in the house some people rub the pups noses in it? If that was done to the owners who don’t pick the mess up maybe it would help train the owners🤔

Have you ever seen a dog walker hang a plastic bag containing dog shit from a branch?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, openspaceman said:

This was always the policy locally post 1976 but seems to be abandoned now.

 

Since then of course much nitrogen has been added to the soil from vehicle exhausts, coupled with rich dog food it has led to an increase  in unwanted vegetation on the heath.

 

The obvious solution is cut and collect but the wildlife trusts will not grasp the nettle and find an off site solution. It was the days when common grazing removed these minerals (to be deposited on a home farm or abattoir) that formed these heaths.

Off site soloutions (grab lorries, tub grinders, green waste sites) are stupidly expensive and for this reason I don't support them.The most practical soloution in my experience is a dump site on a low value bit of the heath. There's always a nutrient dense corner covered in birch and bracken somewhere.

 

Burning is good in theory but it can be a struggle to burn pulled scrub due to the volume of soil on the roots. And the fire site will always need clearing up thoroughly anyhow. So seems pretty pointless to me given that a well stacked dump site on waste ground will rot down in five years to nearly nothing, whilst providing a habitat for certain things. Basically, I think there's limited money for any nature reserve, so let's not spunk it processing green waste any more than necessary.

 

I do both depending upon what the client wants. Wish I didn't have to bother with the extra hassle of burning though.

Edited by doobin
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.