Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Alder as firewood again !!


cessna
 Share

Recommended Posts

I read somewhere that alder was favoured for watery uses, such as the pilings that Venice is built on, and water pipes and conduits, which is odd given everyone's experience of it rotting quickly. 

There's obviously more to this wood business than common sense . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

37 minutes ago, Mr. Ed said:

I read somewhere that alder was favoured for watery uses, such as the pilings that Venice is built on, and water pipes and conduits, which is odd given everyone's experience of it rotting quickly. 

There's obviously more to this wood business than common sense . . .

Oxygen can't get to it underwater. Different environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, doobin said:

Oxygen can't get to it underwater. Different environment.

 

34 minutes ago, doobin said:

Oxygen can't get to it underwater. Different environment.

fish manage to get O2 out of water ......:)

Edited by Stubby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would hope so given the extra work and energy required to produce charcoal.

Actually making charcoal with a retort is a lot easier and more efficient than using a ring kiln. A burn takes 8 - 10 hrs and a day to cool, but you can be doing other things while a burn is underway..for example I’m processing Apple today.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But for the price of one retort you could just get say get 5 kilns etc, and heard of retorts that wear out & distort etc after several yrs....

 

Retort is more efficient % yield  and shorter burn time....

 

But as the main % of the job is the loading unloading and sorting of fines,  bagging up, retort desn't help with any of that?

 

So  is the price & profit of on  the product, worth the extra investment of a retort?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, doobin said:

Meh. Aeorobic/anerobic (i think), thats what I was getting at. Basically it's different underwater.

I know what you meant doobs , I was just being a twat  :D. Some of the most sort after timber is that which is pulled out of a swamp .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Stubby said:

I know what you meant doobs , I was just being a twat  :D. Some of the most sort after timber is that which is pulled out of a swamp .

Most timber will last well under water especially if submerged in mud.  I think I read that one of New York’s famous old bridges uses huge pine pilings as foundations, and that they are still in perfect condition.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.