Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

A challenge for the collective strength of Arbtalk


GardenKit
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 232
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The numbers are rising, albeit very slowly. To be honest, this petition alone is unlikely to bring about the removal of the Road Fuel Duty.

But please keep on signing, it is still a very good way for the government to judge the depth of feeling. There are various other ways in which the goverment ids being lobbied on this issue.

 

If any of you are keen to use Aspen please dont let the price stand in your way. When you take all things into consideration the real cost is actually not that great and a small increase in your charging will easily cover it.

Certainly dont wait for a price reduction before switching, just treat it as a bonus when it happens.

 

 

 

Thank you for your continued support.

Edited by Steve Bullman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Economic

 

Helping to narrow the price gap between normal pump fuel and alkalyte fuel will encourage more people to use the posh stuff (which will still be more expensive). HMRC will lose 58p/litre duty but will get more back in increased VAT revenues.

Many consumers are on the edge of changing from pump fuel to this posh stuff. If they do change, the gov will make more money.

 

The above is part of an e-mail which I just sent to my MP (probably in vain but I'm putting off doing something else so why not...).

 

 

Legal

 

Gov officials are given discretionary powers to set things like taxes but they can only act within the powers they are given. Applying road duty to a product obviously not going to be used on the road could be seen as acting outside of their remit. This sort of thing can be challenged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Economic

 

Applying road duty to a product obviously not going to be used on the road could be seen as acting outside of their remit. This sort of thing can be challenged.

 

I totally agree with your principle AHPP.

 

The problem may be that we falsely refer to this duty as "road fuel duty", when its correct term is "unleaded excise duty (UEXD)"

 

This may defeat a challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.