Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

drugs at work!!!!!


simonm
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is uncannily the very same process I went through last year. Lovely fella; work dropped off a day a week - he hit the drink - buggered up the other days and became a nightmare; I did beyond what an "employer" would do to try and help; drove him around, paid him extra or ahead when he'd pi55ed his wage up the wall... atleast I tried. Strange thing was, his family and friends all blame me for causing his problems! I gave the fella a damn good chance imo! And re drugs; I've met a few who are absolutely convinved it improves their performance!!! :001_rolleyes::thumbdown:

 

I've worked with a few like that. Swore blind they worked faster and harder. All I ever wanted to do was eat never ending tubes of Pringles and choccy biccies and veg in front if the tv watching something that didn't involve remembering the plot.

Edited by Taupotreeman
Bleedin predictive text.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Indeed.

 

"Dangerous driving" and "drink driving" are the only criminal motoring offences, all the others are "misdemeanours"

 

Would I employ some one who had a motoring offence?? of course I would, would I employ a drug user?? NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Phew, someone else see's it the same way :thumbup1:

 

What worries me the most is the number of people who seem to feel the need to defend drug use :thumbdown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phew, someone else see's it the same way :thumbup1:

 

What worries me the most is the number of people who seem to feel the need to defend drug use :thumbdown:

 

Yet ( and yes, I know it's legal) we still glorify drinking to excess. Just because it is legal doesn't make it any better than some drug use. A recent report from some scientific outfit or other stated that if drugs were re categorised to include tobacco and alcohol with 1 being the most dangerous, they would be rated and number 1 and 3 respectively. I suppose the argument is null and void while they are still legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.