Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

Neighbours have requested I remove tree stump infornt of house as causing cracks in theirs front wall


HB1man
 Share

Question

Hi, As title says.. I have no issue removing the stump but I am worried that it may cause further damage which I would be liable for?

 

They have wrote to me saying it is a subsidence issue.

 

Summary

 

It is a request of mitigation

 

Clay soils have a characteristic where when they dry, they shrink. This shrinkage can result in the soil beneath a foundation to drop which in turn can cause damage to the structure. Dry of the clay soil has occurred and this has been brought about by moisture extraction through the roots of the nearby vegetation. Roots from the Oak tree under your ownership has been implicated as a source of the current subsistence damage, and in order to prevent further subsidence movent of the house and to safeguard future stability it will be necessary for you to complete the following measures - Remove(fell) to near ground level and treat the roots to prevent further regrowth.

 

I have been provided with a Geotechnical Survey Report which I can provide details of if it helps, which I think they have taken samples of soil. Results show Soil Suction and Liquid Limit %

 

I think the main result from the findings is

 

Calculated heave potential for the borehole using the control borehole is

 

BH Depth (m) Heave Potential (mm) Layer Heave (mm)
       
BH1 1 50 28
BH1 2 22 14
BH1 3 8 8

 

 

Main questions are, is there a risk that this can cause further issues that I would be liable for, who best to contact about this (my insurance  say nothing to do with them), what I can do to mitigate any risk on me if I remove it.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
13 minutes ago, HB1man said:

Thanks for the replies!... Looks pretty dead to me..

 

Been here for nearly 2 years, they have only somehow managed to inform me in the last month and the original test was made in Nov 22.lol

 

Will post a picture tomorrow morning

Well I can't see what they have to gain from this . Tell them if they want a dead stump removed then fill yer boots but they are paying for it . Edit . ....Oh yea and tell them you don't like their wall paper ....

Edited by Stubby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

Am i reading this right? I don't see the neighbour saying that you would be resonsible for heave. Indeed, you wouldn't be in any circumstances.

 

According to the borehole analysis, it might turn out to have been a bad idea to insist on removal of the tree, since the heave potential is significant.

 

A dead tree draws no water and cannot cause further subsidence. I can't see why removal of a stump would be necessary.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
23 hours ago, HB1man said:

Roots from the Oak tree under your ownership has been implicated as a source of the current subsistence damage, and in order to prevent further subsidence movent of the house and to safeguard future stability it will be necessary for you to complete the following measures - Remove(fell) to near ground level and treat the roots to prevent further regrowth.

Is this tree still standing?, stump shown is a conifer so it's dead as others have said. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Personally I'd be investigating that gutter downpipe and where it goes to having zoomed in on it and the adjacent brickwork. Neither look very good and downpipe looks a bit diy with number of adaptors/connectors.

As others have said that stump is a conifer and no problem but where have the oak leaves come from? Another tree in area? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I dont have any other trees in my front garden, I'm in a close..  right after my front garden there is a walkway and then after that there is a patch of grass with a few trees.. I have already checked my title for bounders and it is does not include anything after the walkway and even then there are no trees directly in front of it... so am stumped. gone back to them now and told them they need to explain wth they want

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.