Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Hiab outrigger leg kills pedestrian


scbk
 Share

Recommended Posts

This sad accident happened back in 2019, when I saw the photo of the lorry at the time, I did wonder if that was the case

 

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Pedestrian Chloe Morrison, 26, was struck by a lorry in the Highlands on Friday afternoon.

 

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Nursery teacher Chloe Morrison was allegedly struck by an unsecured part of the lorry.

 

 

_109412796_rtca82drumnadrochitlorryvsped

 

 

Edited by scbk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 1 year later...

Just to update this old thread:

 

The driver got 100hrs community service and 12mth driving ban.

 

There was cctv footage, the guy fuelled up 75 miles before the accident, and the warning light was on to show the leg wasn't secure.

 

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

A driver convicted of causing Chloe Morrison's death was ordered to carry out 100 hours' unpaid work.

 

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waterbuoy said:

Strike's me that life is cheap based on that judgement

It is. They can only die once. No care costs etc. Try paralysing a 37-year-old hedge fund manager with six dependents or bilaterally blinding a wildlife photographer at National Geographic. That's the expensive stuff. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also the need to disconnect the perhaps non-serious, or unintended, or trival even, nature of the causation, from the possibly very highly unlikely outcome, like a fatality.

Life is, I suppose, a bit of a lottery.

P.S.

Am I correct that in respect of causing a death with a motor vehicle, whether charged with careless or reckless driving, that jail is basically a foregone conclusion, but crippling someone or leaving them in a wheelchair does not attract the same mandatory jail sentence? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But surely not securing an outrigger is neither trivial nor non-serious - as this case sadly demonstrates? 

An outrigger which is not secured is either going to take out a vehicle coming in the other direction or, in this case, something or someone on the nearside?  That is (IMHO) not 'very unlikely' but instead closer to 'probable'.

So far as your PS is concerned then this case suggests that isn't so.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.