Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Big J on radio 4..


benedmonds
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, eggsarascal said:

I guess it depends where you stand on the subject of taxation, some folk will say it's theft others will say it isn't.

Tax is tax, theft is theft. Some folk might say black is white I suppose, but doesn’t mean it is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

3 hours ago, AHPP said:

I strongly suspect the dolescum are a drop in the ocean compared to the landscum.

I don't agree with your train of thought or your language but if you mean the costs to society of non equitable subsidies (and tax avoision??) exceeds exceeds the costs of supporting the unemployed and poorer parts of society yes, in spades.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, difflock said:

 

Gents, I can only reiteriate my family owned farm upbringing of 60-50 year ago. It was very plain, any money was re-invested in the farm business. My father and his brother worked brutally hard. There was no mains electric. There was no mains water.There were no holidays. There were few luxuries, compared to my townie classmates.

These things may have changed, BUT that is how family owned farms were inherited or accrued. You can be as envious and jealous of the current farmers/landowners as you like but you sound like Uncle Joe Stalin and his reaction to, and treatment of the Kulaks. Link attatched.

EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

 

Chuck the envious and jealous in and think people take notice of it. According to your logic people who have worked hard and done well should be entitled to state hand outs yet if you've worked hard in a low paid job or fallen on your arse and need a lift from the state you can fuck right off, and that makes me Stalin like, righto.

 

And before you start I've never defended the feral, the feckless and long term useless.

Edited by eggsarascal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to what a lot are assuming the current subsidy system in this country did not come about because UK farmers are lazy , bad at they do or anything else of that nature, in fact totally the opposite.Pre EU farm subsidies were introduced to put cheaper food on the table and keep farms afloat at the same time. UK farmers were doing what was asked of them and because of their efficiency we had milk mountains, beef , potatoes, lamb, etc etc in intervention .EU farmers who are  less efficient could not compete, hence the goal post moving by Brussels.Without subsidies food bills could easily double, that would be the cost of production, the consumer does get the benefit of subsidies, and a lot of the money filters back into local economies.

Child allowance is a "benefit", I wonder how many of the knockers have decided not to claim that because it is "wrong"? 

Its very easy to take the moral high ground based on assumptions, a very high percentage of farmers are tenants faced with high rents.We have arguably the best highest animal welfare standards in the world with full traceability on produce , but it comes at a cost.Most farmers I know, including my own family members would be happier farming instead of receiving environmental payments, they do not make the rules.nor do they dictate the prices, processors and supermarkets do that for them.

Commercial forestry is a subsidised industry, receives tax breaks and is long term. If it was attractive there would be a rush to plant land,but its not happening, nor is it likely to without further subsidies. 

Eggs made a reference about a county council holding,.. three years ago I did some work not far from Milton Keynes, the council had taken back 500 acres of prime tenanted agricultural land to go under concrete.

One day with the annual land loss, and population increase we will become hungry, subsidies may not seem a bad thing then.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stubby said:

You mean a dog toilet Jonathan ?

I think that's a bit of a negative view to take on it. 

 

I use the example of a woodland we're working in in October. 22 acres owned by one family from a small village. He lets anyone from the village walk around and use it, and it's completely unblighted by litter or dog poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MattyF said:

To be fair j if you had not spent a fortune on brand new gear you could of brought your self a nice bit of land.
We have a nice bit of land but apart from one decent tractor on finance every thing else is old kit.

Yes and no. I'll be in a position to buy a bit of land before the end of the year, but I had to spend the money on the kit to land the work. The financed and outright owned kit doesn't phase me. It's a necessary evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Big J said:

I think that's a bit of a negative view to take on it. 

 

I use the example of a woodland we're working in in October. 22 acres owned by one family from a small village. He lets anyone from the village walk around and use it, and it's completely unblighted by litter or dog poo.

Good. There's a lady local to here who owns a woodland, not sure on acreage, she not only harvests the timber but runs kid's activity days where they build dens, have fires and generally mess about in the woods.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and no. I'll be in a position to buy a bit of land before the end of the year, but I had to spend the money on the kit to land the work. The financed and outright owned kit doesn't phase me. It's a necessary evil.

Aye but you can’t have it all and every thing right now , it can’t take a life time or generations to build it up get it right or find a balance and even if you do I don’t think it will ever be enough for some... I think your lucky to be in the position your in a beautiful part of the country.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, eggsarascal said:

Good. There's a lady local to here who owns a woodland, not sure on acreage, she not only harvests the timber but runs kid's activity days where they build dens, have fires and generally mess about in the woods.

That's great to hear. The woodland I mentioned is a lovely mix of douglas and sitka (both really needing thinning) combined with some completely mixed softwood/broadleaf areas and then a really interesting pocket of alder coppice under oak and ash standard. It'll be lovely once we're finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Conor Wright said:


A rough estimate leads me to believe that the average payment in my local area is in the region of 15k. 

See for yourself with this helpful website Kevin Johnson of this parish recently posted.

FARMSUBSIDY.ORG

FarmSubsidy shows who gets subsidies under the European Common Agricultural Policy

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.