Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Law on emergency work if a maintenance contract already exists?


flatyre
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey folks there is still a lot of damaged and dangerous trees in my area (commercial properties) from storm Opelia which was months ago, and we've taken a bit of a battering in more recent times. As a result I have noticed a lot of damaged and dangerous trees which have not been dealt with. Each time I offer my services I am told that there is a contract in place with another tree firm which is fair enough. As an example a local nursing home has a damaged pine tree right next to the entrance, a large limb is hanging over the road and in danger of coming down. I offered to remove it but was told the company who own the home have a contracted tree firm. I imagine its one of the big firms in the area who have big maintenance contracts, utility contracts, and huge domestic operations to honour. Understandably their smaller contracts get sidelined but it does leave dangerous situations which should be addressed sooner rather than later. I understand this might seem like i'm trying to poach other firms customers, but if they are unable to fulfil their contract in a suitable timeframe is there any way such emergency work can be given to another firm outside of the contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

21 hours ago, flatyre said:

but if they are unable to fulfil their contract in a suitable timeframe is there any way such emergency work can be given to another firm outside of the contract?

As Devontwig says, the liability/negligence aspect would fall to the owner (who'd probably chase the contractor) so it would be in the owners best interests to get the work done. 

 

The contractor might then pursue the owner for a breach of contract, but IMO would be unsuccessful and it's probably unlikely that any contract is so specific as to prevent emergency works by third parties if the need arises.

 

If you're really concerned that there is imminent danger, the best you can do is to inform the owners that responsibility and blame would land at their door if a death or injury could have, 'reasonably' been prevented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a basic response time in 'emergency ' works in contracts ( if the client notifies the contractor ) that would preclude shelving such hazards . It would then fall on the tree contractor being liable . Breach of contract is pretty naughty and a tree company would be stupid to let those jobs sit on the books. K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine it’s a pot hole on the road, do you think the council would let someone with their wheel barrow and bag of tar fill them up?
It’s someone else’s work, you have been told this. I’d imagine they have prioritised their jobs and the ones you are seeing are further down the list.
It’s a bit like turning up at your mates house un announced when you know there’s a party and you are not invited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Khriss said:

I think there is a basic response time in 'emergency ' works in contracts ( if the client notifies the contractor ) that would preclude shelving such hazards . It would then fall on the tree contractor being liable . Breach of contract is pretty naughty and a tree company would be stupid to let those jobs sit on the books. K

Tree contractor being liable? Liable for breach of contract (if not responding in within pre-determined timescale) but you’re not suggesting liable for the land owners hazard causing damage / harm are you Khriss? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the tree companies I have worked for Kev have a maximum response time to a reported incident. Often it's  within 30 minutes ! As breaching that could be putting client at risk or exposing Public to harm - it's a legal can of worms, if you haven't responded in acceptable time it could land on yr desk with a thump ! Landowner is responsible for All that happens on Their land - Inc Contractors they engage, so it's potential to be a nasty case if tree company fails to respond to hazard trees. K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.