Trump Petition

[eggsarascal]

I'm sorry Eggs it's you that's not enlightened Trump is a frount man who doesn't rule anything if you want me to do a long winded tex with who does and why I can but to be honest I think you will struggle due to connective dissidence which is very deeply intrenched across the pages of Arbtalk which is a good thing as it leads to harmony in the short term but long term it will be our downfall.

 

If you want a book to read buy A Pale horse good read and a lot of knowledge if not a little scary.

 

Have you taken a bump to the head Mike?

[matelot]

For the last 50 years America has had travel restrictions with Cuba and no one has had hysterical protests. We all know that many people in Syria etc hate America and burn the American flag at every opportunity. I just don't see why people are so against Trump.

 

Why should America accept migrants from places like this?

[Mortimer Firewood]

Have you taken a bump to the head Mike?

 

No just had this sickness bug it's not been pleasant the last 24 hours.

 

Maybe I'll regain my senses and start talking about stuff I'm clueless on and don't have any understanding of.

 

Problem is once you see it and know the truth there's no unknowing it and it's destroyed people's lives.

 

My sons acident made me question everything and the one thing I've learned is your not in control of anything you think you are but your not yes you can steer it but ultimately it's a journey and your along for the ride.

[TIMON]

But then you probably aren't a lawyer …

 

 

I don't need to be to recognise political bias when I see it. The key phrase here is.... "Judges appointed by Obama".

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk

[Richard 1234]

I don't need to be to recognise political bias when I see it. The key phrase here is.... "Judges appointed by Obama".

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk

 

 

If that's the case all he need do is take it to judges that dubya appointed?

My thought is that trump will get his man appointed in the Supreme Court and then take it there!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk

[Mark J]

What planet are you from? Over the last 30 years anyone that was concerned about migration was labelled a "racist".

 

You said it yourself earlier on in this thread, That someone who cares about immigration isn't necessarily a racist.

 

I was agreeing with you.

 

The majority of people have legitimate concerns. Fair play. You're just constantly banging on about your hatred of islam, third world countries, and anyone other than yourself . Whatever floats your boat. However, I for one am sick of you bleating on about it and starting arguements just for the crack.

 

So, you've made your point, why not settle back, have a beer and read your hitler youth magasine in front of the fuhrer, I mean fire.

[Duncansimpson]

I agree, you can certainly be concerned about immigration without being a racist. We should all be concerned about if only because so many people are.

You are only a racist (imo) if you start dictating which colour, race or creed you want in, or don't want in.

[MattyF]

[ame]

[/ame] if you bare the voice they make some very valid points about this argument and I definitely agree with them that George soros is behind the clintons the man who brought down the Bank of England in 92 and forced us to join the single market, if you scour the internet you will find his latest Russian schemes and why he is banned from there, this man betrayed his own people to the nazis in ww2 if you look deep you will see why the media do there best to discredit trump at every turn he is costing them billions and scuppering there plans for one giant global economy.

I'll go and sit in the corner with my tin foil hat now.

Edited February 10, 2017 by MattyF

[Mark J]

Sitting here with my extra thick, turkey foil, hat on. I think that the current encumbent is there to normalise the rfid biometric chipping of people. Then, the weather vane upon my tin foil hat tells me, the global economy will have us walloped.

[TIMON]

Another article here exposing the hypocrisy of the protest movement. Again , it's a bit lengthy but worth a read nonetheless.

 

 

 

Trojan Horses in Women's Movement

by Khadija Khan

February 11, 2017 at 5:00 am

Send

 

 

Share47

It must be so convenient, while marching in the safe confines of Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and beaten and violated in their own homes. These women in hijabs marching on Washington do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West," protected from such barbarity.

 

The Western culture that allows women to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just a tool they use to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and imposition of theocratic beliefs.

 

Does Linda Sarsour really think that people have gone so mad that they will give up the civil liberties that their ancestors earned through the centuries, merely for interest-free loans?

 

The hypocrisy is that Sarsour's bold lifestyle in the US portrays that deep down she herself loathes the suppressing conditions that she promotes for the poor women of the Muslim world, who actually have to live with them. Coming from a conservative Muslim society, I know the culture she yearns for would never allow her to launch such activism without permission from her "guardian" men.

 

The dissenting voices of the oppressed are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own totalitarian regimes and at the same time by Western apologists for these tyrants.

 

Why do women who believe in equal rights for women, pick as their spokesperson someone who one minute boasts of her supposed dissent as "patriotism," while the next minute advocating chopping off other womens' genitals? It is like choosing a hangman to campaign against the death penalty, or the head of ISIS to campaign for same sex marriages.

 

The principles of "dissent," of which they claim to be so proud, and to have borrowed from religious sources, are actually the modern world's liberal values and human rights -- just those rights values they seem to be trying to destroy.

 

From the other side of their mouths, however, they are trying to impose Islamic sharia law on the West. Unfortunately, sharia is openly antagonistic to Western values and human rights.

 

How can cults that believe in dominating others call themselves progressive, when their entire message runs counter to the spirit of tolerance and social coexistence?

 

The champions of sharia have always said they wish to establish a "righteous" form of government, made by divine law, and presumably to that end, they implant their set of rules -- such as allowing no debate or criticism on their beliefs, or such as segregating sexes -- to destroy modern democracies.

 

It must be so convenient, while marching on Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and domestically beaten and violated -- and all the while, in the safe confines of Washington, to stay silent on issues of truly massive abuse: floggings; acid burnings; chopping off limbs or heads, or burning, drowning or burying people alive.

 

These women in hijabs marching on Washington DC do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West', protected from such barbarity.

 

The values they are enjoying here are the values of the enlightened world and have nothing to do with the culture they are trying to impose on others.

 

The culture that is allowing women such as Linda Sarsour to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just the culture they are using to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and the imposition of theocratic beliefs through infiltration or force.

 

The culture to which Sarsour says she aspires, allows mutilating women but does not allow women to speak in a loud tone, let alone speaking through microphones. Hence, she owes her current privileges to her American identity.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk