Potus ???

[Youngstu]

19 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

You have been given the opportunity to let this go but seem to want to keep picking away at it. I’d far rather you get to the point and say what you want rather than pissing around like another ATL member often does on here. 
I tend not to talk about others or indeed be in the habit of saying one thing behind their back and something different to them in person.

There are two genders, you are a male or a female at birth, if I had a friend or a family member who I’d known for years as x and then decided y is the new gender or title then as I’ve told you already do not  insult me and the reality of nature and expect me to play along with the illusion that a man can be a woman just because he identifies as such. I don’t know how much clearer you want that to be. 
Anyway you raise your kids as you see fit with as many genders as you want, I’ve absolutely no interest at all in playing this to and fro ludicrous transgender bollocks, hypothetical scenario game with you. 
If you want to see the utter madness that happens when you try and justify the shite you are on about do some research on the case in the pic attached, it was as though grown sensible adults had lost all sense of reality “ trans woman ffs “ actually think about it for a moment. 
 

Not really the best of arguments for not respecting the decisions and wishes of another person! One extreme example doesn't mean it's the same for everyone, believe it or not!

 

If everything you say there is true, you really are not a very pleasant, kind or respectful person, unless people have the same views and values as you.

[GarethM]

20 minutes ago, Youngstu said:

Not really the best of arguments for not respecting the decisions and wishes of another person! One extreme example doesn't mean it's the same for everyone, believe it or not!

 

If everything you say there is true, you really are not a very pleasant, kind or respectful person, unless people have the same views and values as you.

So you want a sliding scale of BS ways to police and enforce your "tolerance" ?.

 

No doubt a flow chart that looks like one of your mind map mood boards. Binary male or female is a pretty simple yardstick.

 

How about if you have a penis, no female prison. Cut it off entirely and I might be more open minded!.

[Youngstu]

16 minutes ago, GarethM said:

So you want a sliding scale of BS ways to police and enforce your "tolerance" ?.

 

No doubt a flow chart that looks like one of your mind map mood boards. Binary male or female is a pretty simple yardstick.

 

How about if you have a penis, no female prison. Cut it off entirely and I might be more open minded!.

not sure where I said anything about prisons or even the police!

I was talking about respecting decisions in day to day life as opposed to being intentionally offensive to that person.

[GarethM]

5 minutes ago, Youngstu said:

not sure where I said anything about prisons or even the police!

I was talking about respecting decisions in day to day life as opposed to being intentionally offensive to that person.

With any touchy feely bs ideal you're extolling, has to be legally challenged to it's eventual extreme.

 

That's the extreme of your let anyone be what they want bs. Equally the reverse, conscription would that include those girls that claim to be men, they, it, the moon ?

 

You can use the same arguement about theft, oh ignore the low level, at what level does that become big 5,50,500,5000000000000 ?.

Edited yesterday at 13:06 by GarethM

[Bolt]

25 minutes ago, GarethM said:

 

How about if you have a penis, no female prison. Cut it off entirely and I might be more open minded!.

 

The penis is important, but I would imagine you really need to lose the balls as well.

 

[GarethM]

3 minutes ago, Bolt said:

The penis is important, but I would imagine you really need to lose the balls as well.

I did assume that was implied, however maybe just leave 1 as a reminder.

 

Plus I'm not sure you can get no satisfaction without the rest 🙂. Hitler only had one ball etc etc.

[Youngstu]

1 hour ago, GarethM said:

With any touchy feely bs ideal you're extolling, has to be legally challenged to it's eventual extreme.

 

That's the extreme of your let anyone be what they want bs. Equally the reverse, conscription would that include those girls that claim to be men, they, it, the moon ?

 

You can use the same arguement about theft, oh ignore the low level, at what level does that become big 5,50,500,5000000000000 ?.

 

Or by using a similarly flawed logic, there have been teachers, scout leaders, priests, doctors etc etc who have used their position to get close to children for their own pleasure therefore we should get rid of them.

Or people learn to box or do martial arts and use those skills to beat others up, so we'd better stop all that happening. 

Or there have been soldiers, policemen, security guards who commit domestic abuse so they need to be stopped too.

Or alcohol is a major cause of many types of violence and other disorder so that should be banned outright.

 

 

Conscription? if that was to come back over here, should that only apply to men? if so why? In Israel from what I understad it applies to everyone unless they are exempt for some particular reason such as particularly orthodox forms of judaism. 

 

I don't think low level theft should be ignored at all, but at which point is prison appropriate, what is the deciding factor, value, threat of violence or what? as they're full anyway and there has to be a deciding line, to justice system is in a bad place so maybe they need to look at a variety of other things that could be ignored, maybe decriminalisation of drug use or even legalisation across the board to remove the criminal element and help raise some taxes?!

 

Maybe if a choice or behaviour doesn't cause harm to others, where that continues to be the case those involved should be left to it and everyone else should mind their own business, every case being treated individually if and when considered necessary?

[GarethM]

4 minutes ago, Youngstu said:

 

Or by using a similarly flawed logic, there have been teachers, scout leaders, priests, doctors etc etc who have used their position to get close to children for their own pleasure therefore we should get rid of them.

Or people learn to box or do martial arts and use those skills to beat others up, so we'd better stop all that happening. 

Or there have been soldiers, policemen, security guards who commit domestic abuse so they need to be stopped too.

Or alcohol is a major cause of many types of violence and other disorder so that should be banned outright.

 

 

Conscription? if that was to come back over here, should that only apply to men? if so why? In Israel from what I understad it applies to everyone unless they are exempt for some particular reason such as particularly orthodox forms of judaism. 

 

I don't think low level theft should be ignored at all, but at which point is prison appropriate, what is the deciding factor, value, threat of violence or what? as they're full anyway and there has to be a deciding line, to justice system is in a bad place so maybe they need to look at a variety of other things that could be ignored, maybe decriminalisation of drug use or even legalisation across the board to remove the criminal element and help raise some taxes?!

 

Maybe if a choice or behaviour doesn't cause harm to others, where that continues to be the case those involved should be left to it and everyone else should mind their own business, every case being treated individually if and when considered necessary?

Waffle waffle waffle, can I have syrup with that waffle.

 

A spade is a spade, I don't need mental gymnastics to know that.

 

Writing a long dialogue proving you're supposed superiority just proves you're mental gymnastics.

 

You're not doubt the sort of person who loves ticking that pregnant persons box when you go to hospital.

[Johnsond]

3 hours ago, Youngstu said:

Not really the best of arguments for not respecting the decisions and wishes of another person! One extreme example doesn't mean it's the same for everyone, believe it or not!

 

If everything you say there is true, you really are not a very pleasant, kind or respectful person, unless people have the same views and values as you.

You don’t know me or how I interact with people or what I’m like in person. So don’t  judge me because I won’t go along with your multiple gender trans against all the laws of nature insanity, looks like it may be you YS who has the issue here not me. As Ive said crack on raise your kids as you see fit. Now bugger off and let it go. 
A classic example of trying to push your BS too far below. 

[peds]

Subscribe to read

WWW.FT.COM

---

‘They put two extra dog sleds there . . . they thought that was protection,’ says US president

 

“I do believe Greenland, we’ll get — because it really has to do with freedom of the world. It has nothing to do with the United States, other than we’re the one that can provide the freedom. They [Denmark] can’t. They put two dog sleds there two weeks ago, they thought that was protection,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One this weekend.

 

 

 

Yet more nonsense from everyone's favourite rapist.