Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Steven P

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    3,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Steven P

  1. Depends on the level of checking they did. Basic would be "have you been convicted of anything", go up a level would be any financial problems, nationality and so on. Have to go up a few levels before you start ticking boxes "any rumours about sleeping with children" (note any convictions would have shown up at level 1)... So if Saville was never alone with Charles or Thatcher, then from a security point of view the checks needed wouldn't need to that deep... wouldn't need to be.... That is on a pure security thing. However both had advisors - not necessarily security - who should be keeping an ear to the world - and I reckon it is these that weren't doing their jobs right.
  2. To bring the current discussion into some relevance of the thread, those close to the notorious paedophile - Saville - must have known, fair point, "know someone for 20 years2, but that might also draw parallels with Trump and his best friend, the notorous paedophile Epstein, who he knew for 20 years.
  3. That's the one, though I don't know if it has penetrated as far as the racists on Linked in and the senior ladies are probably too old to care. -Edit- I assume it is senior ladies. I shouldn't make assumptions
  4. 400 people didn't read the papers that morning "Ahh,he is dead, I'll speak up", there was a snowball effect, soon as a couple of stories in the press others thought "So I wasn't alone, there were others" and also made their complaint / allegations. Is often the case with the rich and powerful
  5. Fulham football club?
  6. OP sounds reasonable with a reasonable neighbour, very often these post ignore this simple advice:
  7. Though you will dispute this, Savilles case never got to the desk of Starmer for him to make a decision on it, the fault lies further down the chain with collection and presenting evidence to the CPS, and (not a fault) a reluctance of victims to come forward to help make that case believing - as is often the case - that they are the only ones, won't be believed. CPS doesn't dictate what is investigated of course.
  8. Cannot see the problem when the saw does it for you, 2 stroke oil in the left, fuel on the right, as mentioned above just like a bike.
  9. Of course a few weeks ago, and I'll have to check of course who was whinging, that the UK wasn't spending ENOUGH on defence. Cannot have it both ways.
  10. Just go for a dating app, apparently all the rage - I guess dominatrix, gay, straight, senior, anything
  11. Is that so. My comment today was to ask if Trump was loosing it, a valid concern. However considering the thread headline is POTUS, and not "Past Presidents" commenting on the style, actions and policies of the current president is a very valid post to make I reckon.
  12. It is the insinuation that has been made in this thread before by others, you'd be best off asking them.
  13. They probably don't, my friends know what they like, a decent cup of Yorkshire Tea will see them good.
  14. I've got friends and if you make their cuppa wrong, it is a lethal weapon!
  15. The sexual exploits of Presidents wasn't in the article (and noting that Trump "I'll just pop into the Junior Miss World changing rooms" isn't squeaky clean), more the question is he loosing it more than we thought? Is his mental state up to it?
  16. Is Trump loosing the plot more than usual, this post suggests he thinks that Biden was assassinated and replaced by a robot Trump Spreads Bizarre Conspiracy Theory That Biden Was Executed and Replaced by a Robot Clone UK.YAHOO.COM "Democrats don't know the difference," claimed a Truth Social post that the president shared
  17. "Yes. Stop hiding behind details. That bloke over there kicked those children to death. Which foot did he do it with? **************** off."
  18. Does 'Full Fact' have a default setting I wonder "IF story contains Daily Express, AND Richard Tice but NOT Diana = False" ?
  19. aahh, right so you arn't taking ownership of your Tory vote that brought about the mass immigration experiment that they dabbled in then and the subsequent rise in migrant channel boat crossings of their Brexit policies? Both of which you voted for with a Tory vote.
  20. That's my point for the hard of understanding. No small boats under the Blair / Brown government. The Cameron / May/ Johnson / Truss and Sunak governments they increased in numbers... which are the governments you voted for... so as to my first point this morning "That's not quite believable" that you will put blame where it lies. All I am seeing from your recent posts is that the small boat crossings have nothing to do with the Tory governments - you voted for - or Brexit - you voted for - but all to do with the current government. So to my point, if you are unable to acknowledge this what is the chance that a failed Reform government JohnsonD will fess up and blame them?
  21. However, the Tory Party - who you voted for in the relevant elections - didn't foster the small boat crossings at the last election did they? So there you go, apportion blame where it needs to be.
  22. That's not quite believable. When the Tory Party (who Johnson D'Senior Dating voted for) policies created migrants crossing the channel in small boats, following the incessant bleating of Farage, the Labour party are currently getting the blame. No small boat channel crossings under the last Labour government. Suspect MarkJs insinuations that JohnsonD will blame someone else for Reforms potential failings is spot on.
  23. Oohh, nearly brought it back to a discussion and then off to assumptions again. Oh well.
  24. 'Myra' as in starting a conversation, perhaps 'Myra is very ill'... rest of conversation would continue to be 'Myra who?' where as you might start one 'Did you see Boris has had another child'... next line would be 'really, with his trophy blond wife number 4?'.. we'd generally know who 'Boris' is and no clue who 'Myra' is. Likewise "I see Tony has flown out to the middle east again"... I'd be asking 'Tony who?' See what I mean? Not brilliant examples cause using their first names only doesn't happen
  25. If you want to find that out, read the post I wrote. .... senior dating .... Though Leonardo Di Capriol was a bit of a surprise considering his environmental opinions are at odds to the ones you publicly push, and he has a social heart with a bit of giving to good causes and the needy.

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.