GarethM
-
Posts
5,341 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by GarethM
-
New battery but fit an isolator or take a terminal off, old leylands always seem to have earth leakage even with almost non existent wiring resulting in dead batteries. Looks smaller than a 262. Just jump start it off the car, in the old days I even started an old Leyland with ride on lawnmower left running for 5 minutes.
-
Says the man no doubt hoovering it up like a Dyson on steroids.
-
I know you're a little cranky after the long weekend of protesting, but calm down and take a long breath. It's called sarcasm, some would even call it comedic. I know it's so sterile listening to comedy today so you probably don't have a reference point anymore, I've had splinters more fun than half the "modern" comedians.
-
I said truss over Starmer, didn't mention social media.
-
I'd take her over two tier any day if the week.
-
Guessing even a cs100 probably needed the electric equivalent of 7kw 3 phase to cope with loading. Anything larger will need a Tesla style battery, but none of them like heavy draws, sipping yes as they discharge but not like a starter motor setup. Unless you went shaft shredder for example to remove the flywheel requirement in favour of a gearbox.
-
I was referring to having multiple but simultaneously differing and opposing ideas. Geopolitically I view things through a variety of viewpoints. A world devoid of religion isn't going to be peace and harmony, nor is replacing it with music like bill & ted. However the thought of new 2 bed semis having a priest hole would be bloody hilarious on these BBC homes under the hammer. I had presumed it was sarcasm. Just hoping I don't have to swallow anything else from her cock getting poked in my eye!.
-
Which part of my musings are you having trouble with ?. What's the phrase multiple lines of thought or something along those lines.
-
Context my boy, context?
-
381 AD > 2025, hummm 1644. Dumb arse
-
Sniff sniff I smell lefty bs
-
You're aware you can actually have a thought process without having to individually sh1t post all the way down a discussion individually commenting. Heretic would imply a level of belief and as a nation we have been under the Christian faith since the Romans. And to be honest if an armed copper is going to shoot anyone, they'll be using 9mm +pp hollow points so what's the harm in filling the hollow points with pork tallow. The Indian rebellion started after that lie in musket powder got around, other things too tho. But but, Vegans well play nicely then as you don't shoot to wound.
-
Thankfully none of you lefty types are my neighbours and even then I don't have to like them do I. The key word is values is it not!.
-
And I think it does need to be said there's nothing wrong with several thousand years of a Christian base for our country. Without it you lefty types wouldn't be left, whilst not a bible thumper I was raised on its values as was the nation as a whole. There aren't any entirely atheist countries, you can argue the youth are x,y,z. Yes but they still operate within the laws which are generally based upon those principles otherwise it's anarchy. Plus you can argue, okay no Christmas, Easter or bank holidays if you think it's an atheist country.
-
Think I'd actually prefer to read the 80s table piece by Steven Hawking than that Social sciences dribble. No doubt littered with buzzwords like patriarchy and other french touchy feely nonsense. The simple solution is usually the right solution, I don't need a 600 page thesis to tell me black is an absence of colour.
-
Nope, not even a capitalism Vs socialism argument will help you there. I was going to throw in emu wars just to perplex the dumb idea it's about religion. It's not about religion on our side and hasn't been since after the templars.
-
Cough, cough, WW1/2, Vietnam, Gulf 1/2, Afghanistan, Cold War, American War of independence etc etc.
-
They're usually dead, bagged & tagged. My old boss always said make it a legal requirement to be shot with bullets soaked in pork fat or cremated with half a pig. He was a arse but it would send a message that you're not getting her virgin's.
-
They certainly don't on the TV & radio. The chief Imam of the UK doesn't, if they did I would be a lot less critical as all faith leaders would be visibly critical that it goes against all they stand for. Whilst generally speaking those that have got up to mischief were visiting, it would set an example.
-
And at the same time which moderate/leaders call out the radicals?. Most Judeo-Christian types called out the priest fiddlers, they usually atleast recognise the bad and how it's not what they preach.
-
So let's use your logic. A terrorist has a base under a hospital. They either kill the army in a firefight, blow it up with them inside or escape and blow it up with the army inside. So, how do I win ?. Modern warfare is in the grey, as per M. They wear no uniform or insignia etc etc.
-
No he brought up Nazis and the extermination of the Jews, so that's hardly proportionality is it when they're civilian. Rounding up and murdering people in death camps is hardly explained in any context!. One presumes your over the age of 45, so on our doorstep is Ireland. All I see is lefty hand tied logic, you can't do that because x,y,z fine off you pop to explain to the bad man why what they're doing is wrong, just don't complain when they flower in the barrel doesn't stay there
-
You brought up the Nazis, therefore using your logic all wars/conflicts and civil wars are the same and must be judged as such. You can't have two tier wars can we!, you logic must by default also include the previous disagreement on our doorstep, maybe even Pinochet that'll be a fun one for you to explain. In other words stop using our rules of engagement as a yard stick for every alleged freedom fighter because they're usually terrorists. As ones freedom fighter is another's terrorist.
-
You waffle on about proportional responses, ok so apply to the Taliban. How are you going to explain suicide bombings ?. You can't apply our rules of engagement to them blowing themselves up in a crowded market can you.
-
No I'm equating Hamas with being terrorists, plain and simples. Why do you read everything and seem to come to a conclusion that wasn't argued. Next you'll be saying but they're not terrorists, just misguided yoofs drinking cider on the local park.
