I think we need to take a step back and identify what is wrong with pump fuel. Its a big subject that has been covered in depth on various threads, but I bullet a few points here.
Pump petrol contains around 35% aromatics. They do not combust fully and deposit soot in the upper cylinder and exhaust . This leads to a slow increase in compression and decrease in gas flow. But the process is slow and fresh fuel leaves less than stale fuel. Aromatics are also aggressive to elastomers such as fuel lines, diaphragms and tanks. Once again a slow process and better with fresh fuel
Petrol also contains Olefins which react with fuel lines as well as forming gums, again fresh fuel is not as bad as stale fuel.
Petrol contains Oxygenates such as ethanol which lean out the mixture creating high temperatures and possible engine damage.
Stale fuel rejects the 2 stroke oil which was nicely dissolved in the fresh fuel. Engines run on this will suffer from advanced wear and even catastrophic failure. Again, fresh fuel ain' too bad.
So basically, even though petrol is sort of OK, and has been the normal fuel ever since these engines were invented, it does have its problems.
Good fuel management, as many Arbtalkers will have, will reduce these problems to an acceptable level and good engine life will be achieved.
Many less informed operators have very poor fuel management and will suffer problems. We see these problems all the time.
Alkylate fuels contain no Aromatics, no Olefins and no Oxygenates which result in a very pure fuel which without will extend engine life considerably, but at a price.
As many of you point out, the savings using pump petrol will pay for more frequent machine replacement, and that's a fair point with which I sort of agree.
But there is no doubt that engines run better, more consistently, and last longer when burning Alkylate, and that is only part of the story.
Its also better for your health and you cannot really put a price on that.