openspaceman

as pleasant says; likley to be uneconomic. I am less than ten miles north of Honey Bros and could take a look

The brazenness of this amazes me. A 50 year old biker was killed last week locally by a white van, similarly uninsured and unlicensed driver.

I always developed a headache on days I used it, from the anxiety I suppose. Can't say it was humane way of killing but a lot better than phostoxin. I didn't like strychnine much, watching the worms squirm and die as you dipped them in it before sticking them in a mole run. However these are simple, albeit highly reactive, chemicals that were fairly soon neutralised in the environment. Now I mustn't confuse cause and effect but the rise of glyphosate and auxin mimicking complex organic molecules seems to match the decline in insect populations. Look at the time it took to show DDT in our fat or dieldrin as a cause for loss of raptors.

Just a wild thought; have you checked the starter pulley for cracks. A long time ago, and I can no longer remember which saw, I had a saw that you could pull over slowly but when you tried to start it the pulley would jam. What was happening was that as soon as the cord met some resistance it would sink beside the next turn and because the pulley was cracked around the boss the pulley sides were forced out and jammed against the starter cover.

I used to use a kelly kettle on top of woodchips burning top down but latterly with a surplus of electricity I use that. I still think a steam injection would be useful to kill off deep rooted rhizomes, I advocated this for JKW.

I use boiling water but my garden is mostly weeds

Sodium chlorate was banned because of its toxicity as well as being a powerful oxidant but I have a horrible feeling the organic compounds that replaced "simple" herbicides will have far longer term deleterious effects from use and production.

Worse than that, motor good, battery good but control unit banjaxed and not available, all for the sake of a 10 quid control board. I may make a generator from the motor from one of the many mowers I have. Cells from the battery to be repurposed as a starter pack when I get revved up to do it.

Whereas fitting a pushalong ex battery electric deck with a motor from a rusted out Honda was straightforward, 3 bolts with holes aligned.

I didn't remember it was that late. Back before then you could buy all the bits from Indespension, bolt it together and use it. If it grossed less than 750kg then it didn't need brakes but I thought it did need suspension if it went over 20mph. I'm just scrapping my pre 1986 Bateson tipper because you can't get tyres for it anymore and it would need an IVA if I changed the wheels and axles.

I will be interested to hear about what is new from this tour, especially about sooty bark disease. I have just learned that a house in Aldershot is to be evacuated whilst three diseased sycamores are felled because of the danger from spores. When I was working on diseased trees in the hot summer of 76 the only precautions we took was to disinfect the tools with Jeyes fluid so I wonder what the advice is now and has there been an increase of infected trees and any incidences of human health problems?

Wasn't there a 2006 cut off date? If in use before then and lawful then exempt

Picture looks like it came from my era, the sixties, great shot classic natural beauty, lovely.

Which bit? There is quite old case law about removing overhanging branches (without notice) dating back nearly 200 years. As to the debate about whether a TPO can be ignored in the case of an actionable nuisance has been tested in court yet, I didn't think so but the barrister who wrote "Law of Trees, Forests and Hedges" appeared to suggest it was so. I can't afford the book let alone the legal costs if he is wrong 😉

Well you can waste your time trying to disabuse him of that view, or do it anyway. Yes the right to cut anything overhanging your land trumps all else, except statutory protections.

Mouse nest in silencer then?

Having had one poor neighbour out of the three who have lived in the attached house I was glad to see him go. Now whilst it never pays to appease an objectionable neighbour I wouldn't unnecessarily start a row. Also you are supposed to mention neighbour disputes in any future sale details. Just look at past court cases to see how these things can escalate, a boundary determination is cheap in comparison.

Just for interest if you get to agree on a boundary /assets/static/govuk-opengraph-image-dade2dad5775023b0568381c4c074b86318194edb36d3d68df721eea7deeac4b.png Your property boundaries: Apply to record the exact boundary - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK About your property boundaries, working out your boundary lines, boundaries and neighbour disputes, agreeing who's...

Trouble is deeds may no longer exist, the map on the land registry is normally not good enough, old 25" to mile OS maps may be. What deeds often show is who is responsible to maintain the boundary, with a Tee on its side on the line drawn on the map. Within the last couple of years my brother received a letter threatening action from his neighbour saying that the brick wall between them was dangerous and his responsibility. It wasn't but his solicitor had destroyed the deeds when the land registry went digital, because he remembered the Tee was on the eastern boundless along the street. However the brick wall including the piers was 2ft wide. So I dismantled the wall where it was dangerous, he gained 2ft of garden and secured the victorian brick pavilion that was built on the wall. The issue here is how litigious is the neighbour. This is a civil matter and the value of the tree is close to nothing. So the damages in any action are likely to be over the appropriation of land plus the biggy, legal costs likely to be tens of thousands heaped on the loser.

This can get very messy but from the way the fence is built, with the back side toward you, I would say it's your fence and your tree.

You are probably right, it was likely the coal burner that was there before I got the wood burner, principle was as described though, long time ago.

Okay I get you now, this is what I know as a linkage isolator valve. Industrial machines are a bit different as the pump is driven straight off the nose of the crank so all the pump power is available. i think the pump on my counties puts out about 13hp so adequate for a processor if you get the right motor to take the flow and get 540rpm at a reasonable engine speed.

Is this the same as a high pressure carry over, to enable two spool blocks in series? @Deafhead had a 50B with back hoe about 50 years ago. I thought they were all torque converter, so there is no PTO shaft drive and although the back axle is the same casing as an agricultural machine there is no PTO shaft through the gearbox and only a blanking plate at the back. How many litres/min flow off the pump and what maximum pressure? I would guess it is enough to run a hydraulic PTO at reasonable engine revs. @Gray git posted some stuff about hydraulic PTO for a winch years ago and possible @LGP Eddie did also.

I was thinking the copper may be a tube rather than wire, a capillary tube controlling the airflow via a flap. The dial setting the thermostat. I had a similar dial which set a air flap but it was operated by a bimetal spring, on a Franco Belge log burner.

Are trees manually felled then skylined/highleaded out and processed on landing? If so what happens to the lop and top? I used to think I was doing well to get 10 tonne up on a simple highlead. Modern forwarders put paid to that as the hills round here are not steep enough to be beyond their capabilities, ground damage is another thing though.