Joe Newton

Be careful with dmm, sometimes you want a caritool to break, like if a rigging line hooks itself into it...

small ones are only rated to 5kg, the big ones are rated to 15kg. Mine is 3 years old and still holds a 66 no problem.

[emoji3]

Usually the case, but was working for the same firm two consecutive days, so I left my kit there.

Okay, so it's feeling better now... 2nd this. My saws cut well, I know they do because only I use them. Recently a lad accidentally put my topper in the wrong van. I turned up to a pretty rubbish conny dismantle over 3 sheds and fences galore, and had to use a company saw. I sharpened it before I left the ground and it did the job, but I really did miss mine.

Tried to reply but i can't because the title contains code

Of course it's true, do I regularly talk bollocks? The point is that inadequate first aid training wasn't the issue here. I really feel for the poor blokes family, but it was operator error, as the inquest found. It's something that we can all learn from, no matter what level of experience.

Katie, whilst good first aid training is vital, is simply not the issue here. A fatally injured climber at 50' has a far better chance of self rescue that waiting for a climber to reach then and administer inadequate first aid at height. Have you tried applying a pressure bandage at height with one hand?

It's certainly more acceptable than touching others in the park... Apparently.

10 years ago I would have shit myself. Now it'd just be work. I hate having to work for my money. It was you, I remember the reply. You also suggested touching yourself in the park...

Just rewatched it. Sod climbing that from the ground. Kind if job that sounds amazing in both foresight and hindsight. I recon I'd have enjoyed it after an hour or so when I got used to being that much higher than usual.

Was that that biggish pop mate?

I take my throwline out when I need a humility check (daily). It goes back in the bag when my self esteem is on the floor, usually 15 minutes later.

Wouldn't surprise me. "Neanderthal" doesn't even do@treeman justice.

Wouldn't surprise me. "Neanderthal" doesn't even do@treeman justice.

Getting shit thrown at me can't help.

I'd like to review the Oregon Speedcut system. Only had it for a week so can't comment on its durability though. I'll give it another week and throw some words together.

A few years ago I went on a rec climb near there with a lad on here. He doesn't post recently but his username is @worcwuss. Might be worth a shout.

Also the biggest risk for me while working is driving. Something often not thought about.

mostly complacency. I cut three strips out of my forearm a while ago while cutting with one hand and swinging in with my left. It was a particularly annoying client who was watching so I had to get my groundy to keep him occupied while I came down and wrapped it up. Good thread Steve.

So I was sent a couple of pairs of the Arbortech Xscape gloves to review, by Treehog_safety. I usually wear Pfanner Stretchflex, so any comparisons will be to these. The Xscape gloves are a lightweight, general use type of glove, ideal for climbing. No chainsaw protection, thermal lining or padding. Just a good old work glove. My first impression was very well made fabric, with a very snug but dexterous fit. I received two types from Robin at Arbotec Forestwear. One standard size, and a extended cuff size. The extended cuff comes in useful to tuck your sleeves over or into when you have dirty sappy connies, or mildly prickly stuff. Doesn’t leave any skin on show. To be honest though, I got on better with the standard size, possibly as its whet I’m used to. I can see the benefit in the colder months though, certainly. For climbing, the palms weren’t quite as grippy as the Pfanner gloves, but not by a long way, and they seemed to last a bit better. I climb on 11mm rope so the grip is the main reason I wear gloves. The actual fabric is much tougher than the Pfanners, without being any stiffer or cumbersome. These gloves are advertised as being cut resistant. Once I’d thoroughly worn a pair in, I felt I had to put this to the test for a comprehensive review. My groundsman politely declined to be my guinea pig, so I had to settle for some cordwood as a fake wrist. I used both my sharp pen knife, and a silky for the test cuts. The pen knife laid the Pfanner glove open, while the cut to the Arbortech was significantly less (I think it bluntened my knife too). The Silky however… well I’d still be careful. According to Robyn, at Arbortech, these gloves get their cut resistance from “a kind of ethylene polymer” which is designed to protect against an unintentional contact with a sharp blade. The results spoke for themselves with a straight edged blade. It is NOT chainsaw protective, in case people decide to use these gloves as P.P.E. Chainsaws and Silkys will still make their way through. In short, these gloves are a decent all round pair of work gloves. They last well and are comfy, what more can you ask for. For long climbs I’ll stick to my Pfanners (even though a couple of days can put a new pair into retirement) but for most other jobs they’re a tough “second skin” glove. View full review

read his post again and add a sprinkle of sarcasm.

Sounds promising. I could only spot the saw clips next to the side ds. are there any behind? If you're still posting a few months from now ill put it in my list.

The bridge rings being two separate halves is slightly worrying. Any feedback on these?