AA Teccie (Paul)

...ONLY if what you were measuring were 'trees'! What is a tree then? Blue Book says "But for the purposes of the TPO legislation, the High Court has held that a 'tree' is anything which ordinarily one would call a tree." Would you really call a Laurel hedge a line of trees even if they were over 75mm dia??? I honestly doubt their legal dept / planning enforcement would be prepared to chance it. Sos if this is 'old hat' and 'yawn, yawn time!' Cheers all. Paul

Hi, there is an increasing network of small business contractors who are 'ARB Approved' that you may wish to consider. Please see Directory of Tree Surgeons - Arboricultural Association for further info. Regards.. Paul

(Potentially) the outcome of another poorly specified job me thinks. BS3998 (2010) states: "Specs for a percentage reduction are imprecise and unsatisfactory without reference to length, height, spread etc." A spec could say, for instance, 30% reduction, which is not uncommon, and could result in a tree with an overall height of say 20m ending up: 1. 14m high (height reduction) = TOPPING 2. 15.5m (crown linear reduction, assuming 5m clear stem) = LOPPING 3. 18.4m approx. (crown volume reduction, assuming 5m clear stem) = CROWN REDUCTION A vast difference and one that shouldn't be left to chance. Cheers.. Paul PS Hope I've got me maths right...a first! PPS It might be wholly justified to do 1. & 2. above but be clear about it and use the correct terminology, perhaps avoiding 'topping' and 'lopping' and be careful about misuse of the term 'pollarding' (read the BS), and it doesn't comply with BS3998 (2010), as this implies not to remove more than 1/3rd of foliage bearing material in any one go, so be careful there too. PPPS Sorry, 'gone on' AGAIN!!!

Be careful here as AS has been withdrawn for use as a herbicide application, i.e. stump treatment, although it can still be used as a compost accelerator, or similar, I believe...hmmm! ALSO remember if you are aplying any herbicide as a stump tretament then you are bound by the Pesticide Regs requiring stock controls records, usage records, correct storage in labelled pesticide store, qualifications to apply (PA1 & PA6) and probably lots more. Hence we often recommend to small business contractors who don't do large scale applictaions to simply prepare the stump and then tell the owner to go to their local supplier, garden centres / DIYs etc., and purchase and apply a proprietary product themselves...problem solved. Just for info. You're ever watchful AA Teccie....NURD!!! Cheers.. Paul PS I always found Triclopyr (Garlon 4) verty effective, even on Robinia which suckers profusely.

Sadly, the insurance company are probably simply looking to transfer their liability here in the unlikley event of a future damage claim. Hence the level of detail is unlikely to be too great I would suggest and maybe even just a 'compliment slip' with scribbled note....provided it's got your name and address details on it! Stating the obvious I know, but be sure you've got appropriate insurance here as unlike a tree safety report, perhaps, a subsidence report/letter/compliment slip won;t be covered by your Public Liability insurance and hence Prof. Indemnity, inc. cover for subs reports, will be required. Cheers.. Paul

Hi all, We still have the 'half-price' (saving £247.50 +VAT) opportunity available in this region so please contact me without delay. REMEMBER you will need to be supported / nominated by a LA Tree Officer, or similar. Hope to speak soon. Paul

Firstly, is that 'pollarding' or 'topping' (it certainly don't fit the current BS3998 guidance for pollarding). In practical terms, as very unusual for true pollards to be retained in urban situations, I would expect it to make no great difference, albeit as smaller trees (at least initially) provided they can cope with teh initial physiological shock and they have good vitality and adequate energy reserves....AND they're Limes! There, now to make way for the better informed but that's my ten penneth. Hope yer well Bob! Cheers.. Paul

Yeah, saw that and was somewhat intrigued, still so long as they pay the flights, ha! Nearly went out to Oz last year as the Queensland AA were looking inot setting up a contractor approval scheme but all seems to have gone quiet...boo hoo! Hope yer well Paul.

Hi 'Ecotreecare', Whilst training & experience are very important, and integral to any H&S Plan to acheive competence, there are many other aspects to consider including the raft of different regulations and how we acheive, and demonstrate, compliance. IMHO as an industry, generally speaking, we are pretty good at getting H&S right at the 'sharp end' (forgive the pun) but often have a complete lack of understanding and application when it comes to H&S foundations. Hopefully a 'tailor made' opportunity here is 'ARB Approved Contractor' (ArbAC) status, which is absolutely industry specific, and these days also meets the requirements for the CHAS and SAFEcontractor schemes. For a small business this can be achieved for less than £500 per year. If you are interested it might be worthwhile asking the regional council in question if they would accept 'ArbAC' status, supported by CHAS / SAFEcontractor, informing them that the accreditation is 'recognised' by HSE, as an equivalent. Shout back if you have any questions. Thanks for your time and sorry, didn't mean to hog your post! Cheers, n 'good luck!' Paul

Hi there, Are you a small business operating in the East Anglia region AND could you get a Local Authority Tree Officer to support / nominate you to enter a draw for a FREE (saving £495 +VAT), or 2x half-price (saving £247.50 +VAT), 'ARB Approved Contractor' assessment? If so please contact me directly ASAP! To date almost all businesses have benefitted from this promotional opportunity so get in touch quickly. Thanks all.. Paul

The 'blue book' ("TPOs - a guide to the law and good practice) states: Accessibility of TPOs 3.49 A TPO is a charge on the land on which the trees are situated, and as such should be recorded promptly in the local land charges register.41 The LPA are required to make a copy of the TPO available at their offices for public inspection at all reasonable hours, free of charge.42 In the Secretary of State's view, LPAs should also be able to let members of the public know, over the telephone, whether or not particular trees are the subject of a TPO or situated in a conservation area within 48 hours. As you are no doubt aware there is a fundamental review of the TPO legilsation underway at the moment and it is likely(?) that once passed new guidance will be issued but this is still current as far as I'm aware. In practice, increasingly people are emailing / texting to enquire which seems reasonable and means both sides have a record of the enquiry (whihc could work in your favour in certain situations.) Bottom line IF they don't follow recommended good practice and if problems occurs, they could be subjecet to a formal complaint to the Local Governemtn Ombudsman who wouldn't look too favourable on this. Hope this helps.. Paul (former CBC 'Tree Gang'...shhhh!)

Hi WoodED, You don't as ISA Certified Arborist is an individual's qualification, kinda like RFS Cert Arb or AA Tech Cert (both, 'as was' coz now level 2 & level 4 arb respectively), not a company accreditation like 'ARB Approved', for instance, is. Post back or give me a shout if you need to know more. Cheers.. Paul

"Opportunities in Large" (potentially)....REMEMBER once you become 'ARB Approved' you can also become CHAS & SAFEcontrator 'Accredited Contractors'....hence 3-in-1 (I know, don't give up the day job Paul!!!) Give me a call or 'pm', or indeed reply here, if you wnat to know more. Cheers.. Paul

Rupert, my pleasure you're doing some really excellent stuff there, n as for 'lunch', you didn't notice your dog only has 3 legs now, ha (no worries!) Glad you found the day useful, and indeed the preparation leading upto the day (whihc really is just a reflection on what you're doing day-to-day anyway) and I too hope it serves you well. Coincidentally just on with the report now so I'll fire it over later. Speak soon.. Paul

Rob, this is the reply I've just had back from Nick (eden, Director). "The English version was produced by Jonathan Hazell and I then gave it to the Scottish Branch to "translate". Paul Hanson got a solicitor to go through it and change everything that needed changing. I have no idea what has been changed and I don't think Jonathan was involved so he probably won't know either. I would suggest it would be risky to use Scottish version for an English application." The decision is yours. Cheers.. Paul

Hey Rob, I see where you're going with this one, a canny northener, ha. I'll be honest I'm not sure but will find out n get back to you (obviously the CDs will have Scottish legislative references etc. not English.) Cheers.. Paul

Hi there, I know you're looking for answers "straight from the horses mouth", so to speak (and no reference to David being a 'nag', ha), and obviously it's very (very) early days to say what impact it has had. I would suggest you need to run with the accreditation full term, i.e. 4 years, before really deciding. BUT, it would appear that those businesses who are good at marketing and promoting themselves, or become so as a result of ArbAC, can see tangible benefits and fairly soon in some instances (a S. Wales based contractor told me their projected income this year was around the £1m mark, up from £300k when they were first assessed 2 years ago, and ArbAC has been instrumental in this...obvioulsy tho much of that is in the commercial sector where, clearly, ArbAC+CHAS+SAFEcontractor(now) has greater impact.) Remember also that going through the process of both preparation and the assessment, as David will vouch for, improves your business structure, organisation and arrangements AND, of course, makes you more H&S compliant in discharging your 'employer duties' and looking after your staff (and they you!) Reet, "I'm out of here" (for now) n let you get on with it..! Thanks fer posting.. Paul

Hi Rob, Basically the 8a & 9a, Scottish Versions, are CDs only whereas the 8 & 9 (England & Wales) come with a full guidance note / booklet and CDs. Hence the price difference. Cheers.. Paul

Just so long as it's a bottle n not a 'box', that's a slippery slope to oblivion, ha! Enjoy... Paul

Hi all, I have 2x 'half-price' assessments, saving almost £250* on the initial assessment price (£495*), on offer on a 'first come, first served' basis for 27 / 28 March (2012) for the North London / Home Counties region. This is part of the Local Authority nomination scheme so you will need to secure your Tree Officers support and it is receipt of the form that will secure the place. I'm ready and waiting...but give me a call if you want to know more (tel. 01242 522512 or 07971 995351). Cheers all, take care out there n 'keep warm' Paul ('suthern softie') *+VAT 20%

Hi Stephen, hope yer well! Yer posting 'footer' still makes me laff even tho I must have read it a hundred times. You do need to expand it tho now that we're 'SAFEcontractor' too. Lookin forward to the update..ha! Cheers.. Paul

Yup, sorry Bob...only a week behind! That said if it simplifies things then maybe it's worth doin . Cheers.. Paul

Hi all, just a quick 'heads up' if I may in light of recent rumblings I've become aware of at HSE regarding a few previous 'near miss' incidence. CS32 is no longer 'Medium Trees' but "Trees above 380mm diameter", hence there is no longer an upper size limit on this unit (effectively CS33 Large Trees has gone!) The thorny issue of update / refresher training for tree felling rears it's head here BUT a more 'cost effective' alternative, involving 'up skilling', might be available in many instances. Bottom line if, as with many in my experience, you only hold CS30/31 (SMALL trees) for chainsaw ground units then I would strongly recommend you undertake CS32, and more particularly if your ticket is more than 8/10 years old, again as many are (REMEMBER HSE recommend 5 years for consideration of refresher training...see AGAG 805 below) Thanks all, Paul PS I have included below the NPCT CS32 assessment schedule and a training matrix to hopefully help you manage your training & quals and update / refresher requirements more effectively (hence rather than simply 'tick' the boxes enter the year of attainment.) afag805v2.pdf Qualification+Matrix.doc cs32_assessment_schedule_june_2010.pdf

PUWER 98 (ACOP) Reg. 9 - Training Chainsaw operators 191 All workers who use a chainsaw should be competent to do so. Before using a chainsaw to carry out work on or in a tree, a worker should have received appropriate training and obtained a relevant certificate of competence or national competence award, unless they are undergoing such training and are adequately supervised. For professional users there is currently no real alternative to the City&Guilds / NPTC CoC (cert. of competence). For 'occasional' users, felling scrub/regrowth etc., the Lantra Awards ITA may be an alternative (see Chainsaw Training Courses - Lantra Awards UK). Either way I think he would be well advised to have a qualified (NPTC 30/31 min.), competent and experienced chainsaw operator involved to cut the larger / trickier stuff and 'directly supervise', if only initially til you're happy they're safe, others. Hope the fish appreciate the effort. Good luck! Paul

Fascinating stuff, and what makes this forum such a great place to be (along with my 'fascinating' H&S postings of course...tee hee!) THANK YOU David, and Hama, we learn more every day, keep it coming. Cheers.. Paul