Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Making the news today....


Mick Dempsey

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

7 minutes ago, Richard 1234 said:

 


Sexual perversions wasn’t what I was thinking Matelot was using it for if I’m honest his views on that seem clear enough from his posts! More the hard right websites that will no doubt be being monitored by the police/government type people?
Just a thought

 

Yeah, that's right. I'm sure GCHQ and the police would be foiled by a hard right extremist using "duck duck". 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Richard 1234 said:


Duck duck is a browser designed to stop people tracking what websites you visit! Why would you need that unless you are looking at some ugly stuff?

Boom didn’t want to say it as I have been on matey boys case a bit the last couple of days but glad someone has picked up on it. 

 

The forum is far right too at least we know where his ideals originate from. 

 

Pictures and thousand words matey boy. 

 

To go back to the sun column you posted, I will never trust/believe anything that paper guffs out to use your term since they where caught hacking voicemails of dead soldiers to be make a story and be the first to print the fallens names. 

 

Lastly to accuse @Mark J of being MORE racist than you says to everybody else that your admitting to being racist?!

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WesD said:

The forum is far right too at least we know where his ideals originate from. 

What forum are you talking about?

 

8 minutes ago, WesD said:

To go back to the sun column you posted, I will never trust/believe anything that paper guffs out to use your term since they where caught hacking voicemails of dead soldiers to be make a story and be the first to print the fallens names. 

 

It's not a matter of believing what the Sun says though... It's widely known that the French had a state of emergency and French soldiers were patrolling the streets of French towns/ cities.... 

 

Here are the photos that Wes doesn't believe...

 

Make your own mind up folks. They don't look photoshopped to me.... 

 

 

image.jpg

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have been over this a mind numbing number of times already.


And yet, you use exactly the same arguments and yardstick to try and refute opposing worldviews and push your own views. That’s hypocrisy.

If all you can do is resort to referring to the Taliban etc..to ‘prove’ that all belief in a spiritual component to human existence is bad, then why can’t I use the aforementioned nations to demonstrate the deficiencies of atheist ideals.?

The simple facts are that mankind is clearly not evolving better morals by embracing atheistic beliefs as time goes by...

and...

Nations governed with atheist ideals have never fared any better than the rest of mankind. In fact, the opposite seems to be true.

I’m going to leave it there now and wish you a nice weekend. [emoji41][emoji8]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, matelot said:

What forum are you talking about?

 

It's not a matter of believing what the Sun says though... It's widely known that the French had a state of emergency and French soldiers were patrolling the streets of French towns/ cities.... 

 

Here are the photos that Wes doesn't believe...

 

Make your own mind up folks. They don't look photoshopped to me.... 

 

 

image.jpg

image.jpg

Everyone can see you are trying to twist things again.

 

Wes disputed ONE photo. You've now posted two photos and accused him of doubting both of them.

 

The original photo you posted looks dodgy to me. It could well be the camera angle, but the shadows of the soldiers are clearly all to their right. The child, and bucket don't show the same shadow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, eggsarascal said:

Everyone can see you are trying to twist things again.

 

Wes disputed ONE photo. You've now posted two photos and accused him of doubting both of them.

 

The original photo you posted looks dodgy to me. It could well be the camera angle, but the shadows of the soldiers are clearly all to their right. The child, and bucket don't show the same shadow.

It’s not just the shadows that says the pic is photoshopped. If you where on a beech in a state of emergency that was being patrolled by armed police would you let your child out of your sight. My kids would be by my side but also if it was that bad you wouldn’t be on a public beech with no escape routes? That’s just me though. 

 

As matey boy says pictures can speak a thousand words he just chooses the words that bends the narrative to always suit his agenda!

 

Matey boy was always a little extreme on here but you could always understand his view if you reigned it in a bit. The last 2 days however has shown he’s vile doesn’t really research what he spouts and relies on other to do his hard yards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, TIMON said:

 


And yet, you use exactly the same arguments and yardstick to try and refute opposing worldviews and push your own views. That’s hypocrisy.

If all you can do is resort to referring to the Taliban etc..to ‘prove’ that all belief in a spiritual component to human existence is bad, then why can’t I use the aforementioned nations to demonstrate the deficiencies of atheist ideals.?

The simple facts are that mankind is clearly not evolving better morals by embracing atheistic beliefs as time goes by...

and...

Nations governed with atheist ideals have never fared any better than the rest of mankind. In fact, the opposite seems to be true.

I’m going to leave it there now and wish you a nice weekend. emoji41.pngemoji8.png
 

 

I don't think you understand what atheism is Ti, or rather what it isn't.

 

I would never argue that a spiritual component to human existence is bad. I think quite the opposite. Spirituality does not have to be religious.

 

I can't seem to be able to get my points across without them being ignored, twisted or just completely fabricated so I will retire gracefully to my den of vice and fiery damnation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.