Making the news today....

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

But you're clearly wound up about way more than that. Maybe wind your neck in a wee bit before someone has to turn you in for being a nutjob who shouldn't have access to guns. 

I wouldn't do that, but there are people out there who would. 

You are very much mistaken Mark.

It’s the same left v right shit on here carried across a number of threads over the last few years. None of that really bothers me in any way at all, it’s the internet, it means bugger all in reality, more often than not it’s a bit of amusement. 
What has really pissed me off is the fact that a certain individual has not for the first or second time attempted to gain a few points by dragging my kids or family into conversations including rape and the potential of harm to them. 
You tolerate far more from that particular person than you ever would others including myself due to nothing more than the fact your political views and opinion of Trump align. 
Regarding my FAC Mark  , You wouldn’t do that as you say !! dropping hints are you Mark !! thanks for the “concern” but I’ve a good working relationship with my FLO so no need to be putting the words nutjob and guns  in the same sentence be it accidental or intentional. 
Unfortunately there seems to be no line that some on here are not prepared to cross, if that’s ok with you that’s your choice, for me family in particular kids are most definitely out of bounds. 
Like I said to John, maybe he’s right Mark, I’m not here to see my daughter and the word rape linked in the same thread. 

[Mark J]

18 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

You are very much mistaken Mark.

It’s the same left v right shit on here carried across a number of threads over the last few years. None of that really bothers me in any way at all, it’s the internet, it means bugger all in reality, more often than not it’s a bit of amusement. 
What has really pissed me off is the fact that a certain individual has not for the first or second time attempted to gain a few points by dragging my kids or family into conversations including rape and the potential of harm to them. 
You tolerate far more from that particular person than you ever would others including myself due to nothing more than the fact your political views and opinion of Trump align. 
Regarding my FAC Mark  , You wouldn’t do that as you say !! dropping hints are you Mark !! thanks for the “concern” but I’ve a good working relationship with my FLO so no need to be putting the words nutjob and guns  in the same sentence be it accidental or intentional. 
Unfortunately there seems to be no line that some on here are not prepared to cross, if that’s ok with you that’s your choice, for me family in particular kids are most definitely out of bounds. 
Like I said to John, maybe he’s right Mark, I’m not here to see my daughter and the word rape linked in the same thread. 

Nope, I'm not a grass, and as I said before I understand your anger. I too would be annoyed.
 

This is a public forum. You should be cautious. If someone read your posts they might think you were radicalised, at best. 

[Johnsond]

4 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Nope, I'm not a grass, and as I said before I understand your anger. I too would be annoyed.
 

This is a public forum. You should be cautious. If someone read your posts they might think you were radicalised, at best. 

Mark have you read some of the stuff that’s being posted in the Potus thread  ffs

radicalised, who me😂😂you kidding me. Now as for  some others here they might  very well find themselves on a secret service watch list the quantity and content of the posts they put up🤔. 
 

You got a daughter or kids mark ??

I’m not sure if you have or not, but put it to any of your friends who have a daughter in the same way and use the same language and insinuations that SP has done on more than one occasion and see how they react. 
Im no angel Mark, far from it, and will absolutely fight my corner but there is 100% a line I won’t cross. As another said, he should be ashamed. 

 

As I said thanks for your “concern” but the biggest run in I’ve had with the law since 1990 is 3 points for speeding ( in an HGV ) on the A1 at Berwick that year. 

[Mark J]

 

Edited Monday at 11:50 by Mark J

[Mark J]

[Oldfeller]

 

[tree-fancier123]

his accent says it all - can't quite put my finger on it, but this is 'semi-educated man' . Someone who has studied a bit, but now prefers talking to listening and reading

 

He will probably find a way to show Hamas were reponsible for the shootings of Palestinians queuing for aid

[Oldfeller]

11 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

his accent says it all - can't quite put my finger on it, but this is 'semi-educated man' . Someone who has studied a bit, but now prefers talking to listening and reading

 

He will probably find a way to show Hamas were reponsible for the shootings of Palestinians queuing for aid

truth is truth, it doesn't change whatever accent it's told in, and it would appear he found this truth by listening and reading. 

[tree-fancier123]

yeah right - where was he last week, when he could have been walking round gaza shooting footage of all the healthy people 'no famine here folks its all Hamas propaganda'

[Oldfeller]

I think it's more than a little naive to think that propaganda doesn't exist in conflict,ww1,ww2,Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, bush/blair, wmd, name any conflict that hasn't  used propaganda to gain some kind of advantage, with the evidence aside in this case, it can be fabricated with cgi, actors, coercion,etc.

the video was primarily to expose one particular picture that was one example of that, the media could have investigated it's authenticity but when did they ever let truth spoil a good headline scoop.