Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, Mark Bolam said:

 

Just to give some idea of the scale of the problem, the Allies landed 156000 men on the beaches at Normandy 81 years ago.

 

At the current rate of invasion that’s 141 days, less than 5 months.

 

And it is an invasion.

 

48 hours warning plastered to every corner of the planet, in every language, so the whole world knows.

 

If you try and cross illegally you will be sunk and drown.

 

The message would get through very, very quickly.

 

To all the bedwetters who disagree, it’s no different to a ‘danger of death’ sign on a pylon.

If you’re stupid enough to climb it and touch a wire, you die.

 

Time to take the gloves off.

Whilst your suggestion is probably unnecessarily harsh, I suspect the majority of people now finally agree with you in principle.  What used to really annoy me when the wife and I watched the BBC or ITV news (we no longer bother with main-stream media) was that no-one ever said ‘But they are coming from France’.  We were expected to buy the narrative that they were escaping persecution and war.

 

What a stupid thing to do: cross a dangerous busy shipping lane in a totally unsuitable boat.  No wonder the government at one point wondered whether they could just ‘push them back’.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 hour ago, Mark J said:
WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Witnesses say Israeli forces opened fire on people near distribution point run by Israel-backed foundation


 

From what I hear there is now a new method of distributing the aid.  The Americans are doing it directly.  Finally the people who actually are in need of food may actually get it.

 

I find it difficult to criticise the Israeli government for not allowing aid through knowing that it was not distributed by Hamas but sold to raise money to fund the war.  Why should Israel go to lengths to look after the Palestinian people when their own government don’t?

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Squaredy said:

From what I hear there is now a new method of distributing the aid.  The Americans are doing it directly.  Finally the people who actually are in need of food may actually get it.

 

I find it difficult to criticise the Israeli government for not allowing aid through knowing that it was not distributed by Hamas but sold to raise money to fund the war.  Why should Israel go to lengths to look after the Palestinian people when their own government don’t?

The shootings in the article were at one of those aid places you refer to. 

Do you think the Settlers are right to move into areas that Palestinians have been displaced from? 

Genuine question, as I think that most of us have some common ground. 

I imagine we'll have a few more boatloads of Palestinian people coming over before long. 

Edited by Mark J
Posted (edited)

Parts of this planet have been in conflict for well over 13,000 years, it's never going to stop! well maybe if the entire area was turned to glass. 

aid isn't helping it,, it's prolonging it.

Edited by Oldfeller
Posted
1 hour ago, Mark Bolam said:

 

Just to give some idea of the scale of the problem, the Allies landed 156000 men on the beaches at Normandy 81 years ago.

 

At the current rate of invasion that’s 141 days, less than 5 months.

 

And it is an invasion.

 

48 hours warning plastered to every corner of the planet, in every language, so the whole world knows.

 

If you try and cross illegally you will be sunk and drown.

 

The message would get through very, very quickly.

 

To all the bedwetters who disagree, it’s no different to a ‘danger of death’ sign on a pylon.

If you’re stupid enough to climb it and touch a wire, you die.

 

Time to take the gloves off.

Couldn’t agree more Mark, the libtard fools on here and in society in general who think these people are genuine asylum seekers are as big as problem as the illegals in the boat. The cost to taxpayers alone and the systematic destruction of our country and its values is beyond party politics now. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Steven P said:

 

Does 'Full Fact' have a default setting I wonder "IF story contains Daily Express, AND Richard Tice but NOT Diana = False" ?

You answered that question I’ve asked you repeatedly yet SP ?? 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Oldfeller said:

Parts of this planet have been in conflict for well over 13,000 years, it's never going to stop! well maybe if the entire area was turned to glass. 

aid isn't helping it,, it's prolonging it.

We should stop selling them guns. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.