Making the news today....

[Mark J]

4 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

I don’t need to as unlike the libtards throwing the accusations around on here ( in this case about a ****************ing idiot who decided to pray under a car) they judge me for how I conduct myself and what they see first hand. There’s a few on here who live in absolute fantasy land as far as I’m concerned. Maybe a bit more time spent in a few different countries working with different cultures and they’d discover what true racism actually is. 

What's October 23 got to do with anything?

 

[Johnsond]

35 minutes ago, Mark J said:

What's October 23 got to do with anything?

 

In the context of that post absolutely nothing. 
But just for you Mark October 7th 2023. I can find out the exact time the rape and slaughter of unarmed men women and children started if you want. 
Be careful Mark asking for answers is frowned upon by some around here. I maybe should have adopted a certain members tactic and just acted like you never asked. But then again how stupid would that be. 

Edited June 29 by Johnsond

[Youngstu]

4 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

I don’t need to as unlike the libtards throwing the accusations around on here ( in this case about a ****************ing idiot who decided to pray under a car) they judge me for how I conduct myself and what they see first hand. There’s a few on here who live in absolute fantasy land as far as I’m concerned. Maybe a bit more time spent in a few different countries working with different cultures and they’d discover what true racism actually is. 

Maybe you should share with them all of the posts you have made that have led to accusations of racism, then allow them to make their minds up. 

You clearly have the ability to be pleasant to anyone in a working situation, but as your persona on here demonstrates, you have multiple prejudices, many of which come across as being based on race and religion, as well as other "protected characteristics".. Despite banging on about your openness and honesty, your online version is very open about these prejudices, and if you behaved in the same way in in the real world would probably result in your working life being less successful.  

[Johnsond]

2 hours ago, Mark J said:

What does that denote? @Johnsond

 

Not surprisingly the one sick bastard who clicked like on that dumb arse question  was SP. DT shags a porn actress or a woman who willingly goes to his hotel room and he’s a rapist monster. Hamas rape women and children to death and it’s ok. If you are do in love with the whole Palestinian cause why don’t you get yourself over there Mark. 

Edited June 29 by Johnsond

[Johnsond]

13 minutes ago, Youngstu said:

Maybe you should share with them all of the posts you have made that have led to accusations of racism, then allow them to make their minds up. 

You clearly have the ability to be pleasant to anyone in a working situation, but as your persona on here demonstrates, you have multiple prejudices, many of which come across as being based on race and religion, as well as other "protected characteristics".. Despite banging on about your openness and honesty, your online version is very open about these prejudices, and if you behaved in the same way in in the real world would probably result in your working life being less successful.  

😂😂😂😂Absolute shite, nothing but your libtard ideology showing it cannot deal with facts. “ protected characteristics” 😂😂😂😂 Calling out Islamist extremism including beheadings and the mass rape of under age girls in the UK by Pakistani Muslim gangs does not make you a racist you daft bugger. 

[tree-fancier123]

28 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

DT shags a porn actress or a woman who willingly goes to his hotel room and he’s a rapist monster.

It wasn't that one it was the department store one - her testimony below. As I'm not a woman who's ever been raped by a powerful man I have no idea why she didn't go to the police at the time. It does seem a bit off that she waited until Trump was involved in politics, but she was no porn actress.

 

She said she pushed him back and he again shoved her against the wall, banging her head. She described how Mr. Trump used his weight to hold her against the wall, then pulled down her tights. Ms. Carroll grew emotional as she testified. “I was pushing him back,” she said. “I was almost too frightened to think if I was afraid or not,” she added later.

“His fingers went into my vagina, which was extremely painful,” Ms. Carroll testified. Then, she said, he inserted his penis.

[Johnsond]

7 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

It wasn't that one it was the department store one - her testimony below. As I'm not a woman who's ever been raped by a powerful man I have no idea why she didn't go to the police at the time. It does seem a bit off that she waited until Trump was involved in politics, but she was no porn actress.

 

She said she pushed him back and he again shoved her against the wall, banging her head. She described how Mr. Trump used his weight to hold her against the wall, then pulled down her tights. Ms. Carroll grew emotional as she testified. “I was pushing him back,” she said. “I was almost too frightened to think if I was afraid or not,” she added later.

“His fingers went into my vagina, which was extremely painful,” Ms. Carroll testified. Then, she said, he inserted his penis.

Criminal conviction? 

[tree-fancier123]

12 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Criminal conviction? 

Obviously he didn't get put away - if she had have gone to the police straight away they could have got some DNA maybe (many women who are raped say they were too traumatised at the time to report it) - some aren't telling the truth, but some are. As it is the court found him guilty of sexual abuse and awarded damages

[Steven P]

1 hour ago, tree-fancier123 said:

Obviously he didn't get put away - if she had have gone to the police straight away they could have got some DNA maybe (many women who are raped say they were too traumatised at the time to report it) - some aren't telling the truth, but some are. As it is the court found him guilty of sexual abuse and awarded damages

 

The judge in the civil trial said that while technically she wasn't raped (in the narrow New York legal definition), to the man on the street (you and me), what Trump did was rape. This was from a judge who had sat through all the evidence - more than you or I, or anyone on this forum - and that was his ruling. Damages were awarded accordingly.

[Johnsond]

11 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

The judge in the civil trial said that while technically she wasn't raped (in the narrow New York legal definition), to the man on the street (you and me), what Trump did was rape. This was from a judge who had sat through all the evidence - more than you or I, or anyone on this forum - and that was his ruling. Damages were awarded accordingly.

Any chance of those loose ends being tidied up blagger 

Seeing as here you are on a Sunday afternoon with nothing better to do.