Making the news today....

[sime42]

3 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I think the 'Bannon/Gammon Bots' have invaded the Linked In comments section.


 

 

Do smell essence of Gammon/Bannon when you use LinkedIn?

[Johnsond]

2 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I think the 'Bannon/Gammon Bots' have invaded the Linked In comments section.


 

Nah not really, it’s just so easy when it’s crap like this. Ignore the comments Mark it’s the facts of the story that are nuts. 

[Mark J]

8 minutes ago, sime42 said:

 

Do smell essence of Gammon/Bannon when you use LinkedIn?

Nope, not in general. I usually use it for interesting updates on things that relate to my industry and my interests.

The 'syntax/grammar' of some of the comments on Dave's 'LI'  posts didn't read to me like they were composed by a human. 

The more comments there are, the more chance there is that further stuff aligning with the content of the article will be 'suggested' to the user of such a platform.

Edited August 14, 2024 by Mark J

[Johnsond]

2 hours ago, Steve Bullman said:

Always the easy targets that are made an example of 

Starmer historically hasn’t seemed overly keen on bringing sexual predators to justice. His mark and influence is all over the sentencing we are seeing at the minute. 

[Mark J]

11 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Nah not really, it’s just so easy when it’s crap like this. Ignore the comments Mark it’s the facts of the story that are nuts. 

It happens in every sector, Someone decides who is going to get a job long before things are tendered for. 

[Johnsond]

Just now, Mark J said:

It happens in every sector, Someone decides who is going to get a job long before things are tendered for. 

Well they certainly messed up this time Mark

There’s blatant racism and there’s utter stupidity they ticked both the boxes. 

[Mark J]

2 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Starmer historically hasn’t seemed overly keen on bringing sexual predators to justice. His mark and influence is all over the sentencing we are seeing at the minute. 

Who would you prefer to be doing Starmer's  job right now, and why? And how would you deal with all the refugees on boats coming over?

[Mark J]

Are you on ab

Just now, Johnsond said:

Well they certainly messed up this time Mark

There’s blatant racism and there’s utter stupidity they ticked both the boxes. 

To be fair, some of the things you insinuate on this forum lead me to think that you might also tick those two boxes. 

[sime42]

5 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Nope, not in general. I usually use it for interesting updates on things that relate to my industry and my interests.

The 'syntax/grammar' of some of the comments on Dave's 'LI'  posts didn't read to me like they were composed by a human. 

The more comments there are, the more chance there is that further stuff aligning with the content of the article will be 'suggested' to the user of such a platform.

 

Not sure about the bots or AI content on that page, looked fairly human to me.

 

You're definitely right about the second bit. All these sites are set up to and run by algorithms to give the "consumer" what they want to see in terms of "news" and opinion. It a vicious circle; the more you look at, the more you see. It's a downwards cycle to radicalisation. As we're seeing in this instance.

 

 

 

 

[sime42]