Making the news today....

[Steven P]

6 hours ago, Mike Hill said:

How would you classify white Criminals as "Christians?"

 

Your " whataboutary" is off the charts. I do earnestly believe liberalism ,when it reaches the fever pitch you ceaselessly display Steven is then a mental illness. 

 

Please talk to a professional. 

 

I think you are misunderstanding Mike.

 

I think only an idiot would be thinking any of the crimes highlighted in this thread are exclusive to one portion of the population or another. They are committed by all and when you look at the available statistics none are more represented than others (give or take small variations). I also think you would have to be an idiot to believe that a single factor is the identifying cause of the criminality; it isn't just the race (highlighted many times above), but things like your economic situation, where you live and 101 other things.

 

The charge of racism is well levelled when despite knowing the above, one chooses to only highlight one race rather than focussing on the crime itself. Some of the crimes highlighted are horrific but are only a footnote to the race of the perpetrator. 

 

One thing I do believe is that the members of this forum are not racist, they are good people, no harm to others if they cause no harm to you. Being a member of any forum you are accountable to the ethos of it. If all a casual visitor sees is vitriol and hatred towards non-white races that is the perception they get about all of us. That is not who we are as a group. This is why I believe it is important to note, to highlight and to call out intolerance. I am not a racist, I don't believe you are, but accepting the many racially biased posts paints us in that light.

[Johnsond]

46 minutes ago, Steven P said:

I am not a racist

You didn’t answer as usual SP which of these does not fit your racial profile of what an “ African” looks like.
Which of those is not in your view South African then SP 🤷‍♂️

Edited Tuesday at 19:14 by Johnsond

[Johnsond]

18 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

I think you are misunderstanding Mike.

 

I think only an idiot would be thinking any of the crimes highlighted in this thread are exclusive to one portion of the population or another. They are committed by all and when you look at the available statistics none are more represented than others (give or take small variations). I also think you would have to be an idiot to believe that a single factor is the identifying cause of the criminality; it isn't just the race (highlighted many times above), but things like your economic situation, where you live and 101 other things.

 

The charge of racism is well levelled when despite knowing the above, one chooses to only highlight one race rather than focussing on the crime itself. Some of the crimes highlighted are horrific but are only a footnote to the race of the perpetrator. 

 

One thing I do believe is that the members of this forum are not racist, they are good people, no harm to others if they cause no harm to you. Being a member of any forum you are accountable to the ethos of it. If all a casual visitor sees is vitriol and hatred towards non-white races that is the perception they get about all of us. That is not who we are as a group. This is why I believe it is important to note, to highlight and to call out intolerance. I am not a racist, I don't believe you are, but accepting the many racially biased posts paints us in that light.

What a pile of arrogant sanctimonious pish. 
 

Edited Tuesday at 18:44 by Johnsond

[Johnsond]

35 minutes ago, Steven P said:

They are committed by all and when you look at the available statistics none are more represented than others (give or take small variations)

20x more likely a small variation and it’s certainly not got better since this data was utilised. 🤔

Edited Tuesday at 19:02 by Johnsond

[Mike Hill]

1 hour ago, Steven P said:

 

I think you are misunderstanding Mike.

 

I think only an idiot would be thinking any of the crimes highlighted in this thread are exclusive to one portion of the population or another. They are committed by all and when you look at the available statistics none are more represented than others (give or take small variations). I also think you would have to be an idiot to believe that a single factor is the identifying cause of the criminality; it isn't just the race (highlighted many times above), but things like your economic situation, where you live and 101 other things.

 

The charge of racism is well levelled when despite knowing the above, one chooses to only highlight one race rather than focussing on the crime itself. Some of the crimes highlighted are horrific but are only a footnote to the race of the perpetrator. 

 

One thing I do believe is that the members of this forum are not racist, they are good people, no harm to others if they cause no harm to you. Being a member of any forum you are accountable to the ethos of it. If all a casual visitor sees is vitriol and hatred towards non-white races that is the perception they get about all of us. That is not who we are as a group. This is why I believe it is important to note, to highlight and to call out intolerance. I am not a racist, I don't believe you are, but accepting the many racially biased posts paints us in that light.

 

Total bollocks Steven.

 

Do you think the current mass ,unvetted immigration is a positive gain for GB or a negative?

 

Here is another example. 

 

You and your mates are out for a winter ramble,a storm comes in and your soon soaked,bordering on hypothermic. 

 

You look on the map and make a B-line to the closest shelter that happens to be an Army base. Freezing, you plead your case at the gate. 

 

Do you A: Get given a grey blanket each and a cup of coffee while sitting in the back of a 4 tonner while the kindly Sergeant calls a cab

 

Or B

 

A pass to allow you to wander the base,use the ablution block,Naafi,Rec room,mess and Bar until you feel like leaving?

 

Which of the above scenarios is more likely and why ?

 

 

 

 

 

[BillQ]

On 18/07/2025 at 13:58, tree-fancier123 said:

 

If the government said to me - 'are you happy for some of your tax to pay to keep illegal immigrants alive, or would you rather let them die?' I would say tax me just slightly less and let them die. Selfish I know, but these illegals are not people 

Fortunately the governments are actually humane in their outlook, unlike yourself. In fact I would go as far as saying you are sub-human for just thinking this, disgusting, absolutely disgusting. 

[tree-fancier123]

1 hour ago, BillQ said:

Fortunately the governments are actually humane in their outlook, unlike yourself. In fact I would go as far as saying you are sub-human for just thinking this, disgusting, absolutely disgusting. 

I want no part of being human if it means I have to want to give illegal immigrants a chance at life here.

Pushback in the channel with the Navy would work - Border force too squeamish. Oh and ban the RNLI from responding.

Vote reform Bill. 

If you and yours had a limited supply of food and water you would still share it with some illegal immigrants who happened by - because you are a human being with a heart full of love.

[Johnsond]

Essex Police 'have questions to answer' after pro-migrant protesters 'guided to Epping hotel', says migration minister

APPLE.NEWS

---

Essex Police "have questions to answer" after pro-migrant protesters were guided to the Epping hotel at...

No kidding. 
 

[Steven P]

17 hours ago, Mike Hill said:

 

Total bollocks Steven.

 

Do you think the current mass ,unvetted immigration is a positive gain for GB or a negative?

 

Here is another example. 

 

You and your mates are out for a winter ramble,a storm comes in and your soon soaked,bordering on hypothermic. 

 

You look on the map and make a B-line to the closest shelter that happens to be an Army base. Freezing, you plead your case at the gate. 

 

Do you A: Get given a grey blanket each and a cup of coffee while sitting in the back of a 4 tonner while the kindly Sergeant calls a cab

 

Or B

 

A pass to allow you to wander the base,use the ablution block,Naafi,Rec room,mess and Bar until you feel like leaving?

 

Which of the above scenarios is more likely and why ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ahh, we were talking about 2 different things last night. Crossed wires. You are of course correct and to keep up with your analogy, there needs to be a gate house but once you are OK to pass you should be afforded the hospitality, safety, opportunities and sanctuary all free abuse and intolerance that we would all expect to be offered.

 

Your gatehouse is often the missing link though in a politicians thoughts in the last 5 years or so, suspect it would mean having to talk to the French of all people, and the wider EU... who will of course want to trade bargaining chips. Not something Johnson, Truss, May or Sunak were willing to do with the Brexit negotiations.

[Oldfeller]

Brazilian asylum seeker ‘earned £6k a month’ on rented delivery accounts

WWW.LBC.CO.UK

---

A Brazilian man who has applied for asylum in the UK has been found to be earning...