Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

This your new truth machine ? 

You should try it.

It brings up the sources that are used to form a synopsis. That way you can easily determine how accurate it is. 

It wipes the floor with Google. 
 

WWW.PERPLEXITY.AI

 

Edited by Mark J
Posted
1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

He’s throwing the pardons around big time to some real scum. I guess he thought Hunters get out of jail free card would not look that bad in amongst the others.

IMG_1977.png

Did you read the article?

 

It does go some way to explain the extent of his pardons, including categorical pardons for those incarcerated for possession of marijuana, and service members imprisoned due to their sexual orientation. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

In news closer to home, I see a JSO protester in her 70s who committed the heinous crime against humanity of taking a banner up a gantry over a motorway, and was imprisoned for it, has been released as intended from her 20month sentence only to be recalled to prison because they can't find a monitoring tag small enough to fit her tiny OAP body.

 

Wasn't it just recently they were releasing actual criminals before their sentence was served in order to make room for the people on Facebook having an opinion contra to what they're allowed to think?

Things are just not making sense.

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Gaie Delap was unable to wear an electronic tag due to health problems.

 

  • Like 4
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

Did he murder anyone Mark ? 

He did get pardoned. Why do you think that was?

Have a punt on the truth machine if you're struggling. 

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Doug Tait said:

In news closer to home, I see a JSO protester in her 70s who committed the heinous crime against humanity of taking a banner up a gantry over a motorway, and was imprisoned for it, has been released as intended from her 20month sentence only to be recalled to prison because they can't find a monitoring tag small enough to fit her tiny OAP body.

 

Wasn't it just recently they were releasing actual criminals before their sentence was served in order to make room for the people on Facebook having an opinion contra to what they're allowed to think?

Things are just not making sense.

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Gaie Delap was unable to wear an electronic tag due to health problems.

 


Poor woman.

They want to make a point about the consequences of disruption of service, they gave 2 1/2 years to the people who scaled Dartford QE2 Bridge - cost around £400 K, conservatively, in terms of disruption. each day, they prevented 180 000 vehicles from using the bridge. They gave a 2 year suspended sentence to someone who brought 35Kg of weed into Newcastle from Bangkok. 

Profit is all that matters to some people. 

Edited by Mark J
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Youngstu said:

Did you read the article?

 

It does go some way to explain the extent of his pardons, including categorical pardons for those incarcerated for possession of marijuana, and service members imprisoned due to their sexual orientation. 

 

Yeah I read it, I still think it’s very convenient his son gets a pass at the same time. You missed a few of the more serious convictions. 

Edited by Johnsond
Posted
1 minute ago, Johnsond said:

Yeah I read it, I still think it’s very convenient his son gets a pass at the same time. 

Would you do the same for your son, if you could, and he'd brought trouble to your door?

I probably would,

Posted
6 hours ago, Mike Hill said:

 

I think that is a great idea. Sadly there are three things that prevent this gaining traction.

 

1) The general public and their love of Bambi.

2) The government dosnt support the private ownership of firearms.

3) Stalkers themselves who won't support new people incase they themselves loose stalking grounds.

 

Possibly a fouth with Private land owners not allowing the public or persons unknown onto their land. You have to hit everywhere or sanctuaries are created that hold animals.  I used to cull in forests back home and the best approach is constant even pressure.  Although the general public could shoot the forests,then generally only went after the easy animals,but at least it kept them off the roads.

 

I'd favour going hardline on it, just to force the idea through. If conventional farmed meats were to get too expensive then the Bambis and Fluffy Bunnies will get increasingly more appetising.

This'll be controversial but I'd make the whole thing a state driven enterprise. If we were ever to get a government with some balls to implement a nationwide culling campaign.

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.