Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Making the news today....


Mick Dempsey

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, eggsarascal said:

Okey dokey.

 

I talk for the decent, law abiding citizens of this country… do you really want to hear this shit? Rhetoric, nothing more, nothing less. Scurge and a invasion. Get a grip!

What makes you think we want you as our spokesperson? To be honest, I think we can do better, a lot better. 😁

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

4 hours ago, Retired Climber said:

What makes you think we want you as our spokesperson? To be honest, I think we can do better, a lot better. 😁

I was repeating what Suella said yesterday, seems it went over your head. Strange considering you know what others are thinking before they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here we have another example, look at the headline.

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Robert Jenrick's comments come after the home secretary described the situation as an "invasion".

 

So firstly, he didn't "warn" on anything, and the (very brief) comment he did make on the word "invasion" was only made after repeated hassling and frequent interruptions by the interviewer along that specific line.

 

When you actually listen to the interview, Mr Jenrick was 100% in support of the Home Secretary and the rest of the interview was spent reaffirming that it is a huge problem, any measures taken so far have been entirely inadequate, and it's time for more robust action.

 

This is plainly yet another attempt by the state broadcaster* to influence peoples thinking and perception in a particular way rather than simply report "news".

 

It should bother any right minded person for that reason alone.

 

* - edited for clarity

 

 

Edited by coppice cutter
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, coppice cutter said:

So here we have another example, look at the headline.

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Robert Jenrick's comments come after the home secretary described the situation as an "invasion".

 

So firstly, he didn't "warn" on anything, and the (very brief) comment he did make on the word "invasion" was only made after repeated hassling and frequent interruptions by the interviewer along that specific line.

 

When you actually listen to the interview, Mr Jenrick was 100% in support of the Home Secretary and the rest of the interview was spent reaffirming that it is a huge problem, any measures taken so far have been entirely inadequate, and it's time for more robust action.

 

This is plainly yet another attempt to influence peoples thinking and perception in a particular way rather than simply report "news".

 

It should bother any right minded person for that reason alone.

 

 

100% agree, I watched the bbc team hassling him with relentless interruptions and petty focus on one word. Minutes later there was a Sky news feed saying he’d condemned the use of the word “ Invasion” this was nothing more than a blatant lie designed to swing the narrative a certain way. Quite frankly they are absolutely not all refugees or asylum seekers and the cost to the taxpayer is insane. BBC didn’t even attempt to hide its bias this morning.  I hear figures ranging from between 5-7 million per day, plus the whole dubious sub industry  of human rights lawyers etc. 365 days a year UK taxpayers have to fund this. It’s long since gone past  the point of being about asylum or persecution. 

Edited by Johnsond
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

100% agree, I watched the bbc team hassling him with relentless interruptions and petty focus on one word. Minutes later there was a Sky news feed saying he’d condemned the use of the word “ Invasion” this was literally a blatant lie designed to swing the narrative a certain way. Quite frankly they are absolutely not all refugees or asylum seekers and the cost to the taxpayer is insane. BBC didn’t even attempt to hide its bias this morning.  I hear figures ranging from between 5-7 million per day, plus the whole dubious sub industry  of human rights lawyers etc. 365 days a year UK taxpayers have to fund this. 

This we can agree on, now, how do we fix it? They aren’t just going to stop crossing the channel so we need a legal way of sorting it, any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, eggsarascal said:

This we can agree on, now, how do we fix it? They aren’t just going to stop crossing the channel so we need a legal way of sorting it, any ideas?


How about getting everyone to bang on about how sh it the housing, healthcare, roads, water quality, tv, education, weather,  Devon, politicians, railways, covid response etc. etc. etc. are?

 

No one will want to come here.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.