Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Belt driven or hydraulic cutter heads


simonm
 Share

Recommended Posts

We've just changed our 4012D over to metric bearings.

One new jackshaft and one re-machined.

Bigger better bearings, less expensive than US imperial, sealed and greasable, not the purge type.

480 hours on the clock before the belt shredded due to worn bearings which is normal.

Bearings though, silky smooth, just worn.

The toothed belt is a shocking price though eh?

I did read of one guy who has changed over to using 2 motorcycle chains instead.

I've spoken to others who have used the hydro head and they all had serious issues and have gone back to belt driven machines.

I have a suspicion that I may a bit unique over here in bothering (almost obsessively) to sharpen the grinder teeth.

Whilst our 4012 was down having it's work done we subbed out to a local competitor with a tracked 5014 44hp.

Aside from being better able to work on poor terrain than our 4012 wheeled, I observed that the actual grinding was no faster than ours.

Later, Seb got a look at the teeth and was amazed to see them almost totally rounded off.

This company had previously been running a Bandit with a hydro head and had no end of issues with it.

I'm not saying that blunt teeth are the cause but a company that ignorant about maintenance of teeth probably can't see other problems as the arise.

I can see that a hire compnay might like hydro machines because of their low maintenance but there again, they shift machines on to the likes of us after a couple of years...

So your likely to get some-one elses dirty laundry to wash by buying a high hours used hydro machine.

Having said that, when I replaced a hydro motor for a chipper, I was a bit shocked by the cost of an original spare.

Later, I googled around and found that for 3-4 times less I could have bought one online.

Ah well, next time.

Ty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would get use to hydraulic as that's where it will end, only Carlton are dragging their feet and I know they made a hydraulic grinder but it wasn't successful. Bandit now only make a pedestrian belt grinder, the lack of maintenance & downtime outweigh the other options as it is the downtime that costs the money although polychain belts are getting more expensive.

 

Personally we have only had two motor faults to date but they have since been uprated, it is impossible to proportion costs as each manufacturer and the quality of machines are different. I don't know of one customer who would return to a belt machine to date and I've shifted a few.

 

What about Rayco?

A quick check on their website shows that they don't start hydro cutter wheels till 70 hp.

Edited by Mick Dempsey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I can guess and it rhymes with logsbite.

It's a case of engineers getting carried away with themselves and forgetting about the end user's priorities.

I was using the grinder today (rather I was lying down in the van with my bad back and the lad was grinding) made a tidy sum in an hour. €500 or so euros once a year is no big deal for a quicker machine.

I got a new chipper lately and the salesman started quoting fuel usage to me.

I had to stop him and explain that I don't give a toss about a couple of litres a day, GIVE ME MORE POWER!:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would get use to hydraulic as that's where it will end, only Carlton are dragging their feet and I know they made a hydraulic grinder but it wasn't successful. Bandit now only make a pedestrian belt grinder, the lack of maintenance & downtime outweigh the other options as it is the downtime that costs the money although polychain belts are getting more expensive.

 

Personally we have only had two motor faults to date but they have since been uprated, it is impossible to proportion costs as each manufacturer and the quality of machines are different. I don't know of one customer who would return to a belt machine to date and I've shifted a few.

 

Not convinced, have used both and the power loss on the hydraulic grinders is not acceptable, its like stirring mud with a stick. I also cant accept the high wear rate of the drive motors or pumps nor how all that debris from the associated wear gets trolleyed around the entire hydraulic system. I had a guy here a few years ago that had rather a lot to do with the development of a well known brand of hydraulically driven grinder, we were talking spanners and comparing notes on some stuff going on here and he confessed that there were issues with longevity and that their own hire fleet were in trouble with the above . Belts , bearings and most of the horses at the wheel for me :001_smile:

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.