Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Our own worst enemy?


Gary Prentice
 Share

Recommended Posts

I regularly read comments on here with complaints about how restrictive and difficult red tape makes our lives but sometimes I think we can be our own worst enemy by not thinking what we are doing, the consequences of our actions and how the public view us.

 

I witnessed an incident one afternoon this week which has left me in a position where I don't know how to act.

 

A tree truck, tidy chip box and well signwritten, complete with chipper set up on the pavement -blocking it. Four cones a metre into the road. The tree being dismantled was the other side of a 2m mesh fence and as I passed one stem had been felled over the fence, across the pavement, between the cones and still a metre into the road. A mother with a pushchair attempting to pass was forced almost three metres into the road to do so.

 

Does the blame lie with the lads on site, carrying on without proper traffic management, are they expected to work like that anyway. From what I witnessed there was no concern about this pedestrian the groundsman was to busy chipping and I don't think he even noticed her.

 

I thought that I'd ring the company to make them aware of what was going on, but then thought the owner might actually be on site, in the tree and wouldn't take too kindly to the call. I'm probably going to end up doing nothing, but it's situations like this that encourage the powers-to-be to impose more training, restrictions and costs to all businesses - so is does affect us all.

 

We all, I suspect, cut an odd corner here and there, but this was pretty blatant - with total disregard for pedestrians by blocking the pavement and no restrictions on the public entering the working area. Your thoughts gentleman please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's tricky to say without seeing the site or pictures but sounds like bad planning, whether that was the guys on site or the boss. When we get a job like that we normally swing by and take a look and work out a plan, such as footpath closed signs and an extra groundie to escort pedestrians through etc. Sounds worrying that the section of timber was in the road outside the cordon. If it was council work could it be the job was badly prices/rushed and the guys were trying to hit their target etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's tricky to say without seeing the site or pictures but sounds like bad planning, whether that was the guys on site or the boss. When we get a job like that we normally swing by and take a look and work out a plan, such as footpath closed signs and an extra groundie to escort pedestrians through etc. Sounds worrying that the section of timber was in the road outside the cordon. If it was council work could it be the job was badly prices/rushed and the guys were trying to hit their target etc etc

 

'Corden' might be a bit of an exaggeration, four cones along the kerb wasn't exactly what I'd call a corden:biggrin:

 

It looked to me that they'd decided the quickest way to get it down was to drop onto the pavement, but had insufficient signage or staff to do it correctly. I've worked in the industry long enough to appreciate the weather was cack, time was getting on etc but it was ill thought out and not something I'd want or expect our own staff to be doing. As David and Sean said, it reflects on all of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...... Your thoughts gentleman please.

My wife uses a disability scooter while I cycle with her.We have encountered many a footpath blockage from contractors.

Although I've never experienced it with arborists,it is something that all companies should be aware of & take the relevant steps to enable safe access for everyone.Perhaps even employ a wheelchair user in an advisory capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just sounds like bad planning or a Friday afternoon job. Yes the responsibility lies with the guys on site but also with the manager of the company who has the ultimate responsibility if he sent them out to do the job in that way.

 

Yes it does reflect badly upon us all. In an ideal world they would have a support truck with about 50 pedestrian barriers and signs to set up a safe passage around the work zone but in reality who does that? It was something we raised when we did our chapter 8 course as it is ok closing the path but you need to have a designated safe passage around the work zone but in reality we can't do that. However more cones, signs and barrier tape may have helped to make the work zone safer and more professional looking. Was it a council job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.