Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Thanks for that Cae

 

I will attempt to get some photos of the trunk and unions when work and weather allows. Hopefully you can all offer a more informed opinion of whether the tree needs felling or suggest an alternative when you see those.

Posted
There are some pictures on the faceache page.

 

https://www.facebook.com/LyngConkerTree/photos_stream?ref=page_internal

 

Chris

 

 

I see a basal cavity, dead roots, reactive growth from one union, crown die back (not near the line), heavy limb inclusion, discolouration that could be bleeding canker and possibly a girdling root, as there appears to be no basal flare on one side.

 

That's from seeing a picture and not investigating properly... It's not all I can see either, but as there are ribbons wrapped round it, I can't make out how bad the reactive wood that goes from the bottom upwards is.

 

And finally, to answer why they haven't fitted new lines through the tree, that pole is an 'open point', it's a separate circuit!

Posted
I see a basal cavity, dead roots, reactive growth from one union, crown die back (not near the line), heavy limb inclusion, discolouration that could be bleeding canker and possibly a girdling root, as there appears to be no basal flare on one side.

 

That's from seeing a picture and not investigating properly... It's not all I can see either, but as there are ribbons wrapped round it, I can't make out how bad the reactive wood that goes from the bottom upwards is.

 

And finally, to answer why they haven't fitted new lines through the tree, that pole is an 'open point', it's a separate circuit!

 

the tree is doomed i say doomed , :biggrin:

 

wen it sheds a limb on some kids head they will be bawling @ the pc asking why it wasnt REMOVED !!!!!:thumbdown:

Posted
the tree is doomed i say doomed , :biggrin:

 

 

 

wen it sheds a limb on some kids head they will be bawling @ the pc asking why it wasnt REMOVED !!!!!:thumbdown:

 

 

It's not what the OP wants to hear, but that's likely the case.

 

I fear the original survey was dumbed down a little too much or stevie wonder surveyed it. If you applied highway and utility clearances to it, you don't get much tree left.

Posted
I see a basal cavity, dead roots, reactive growth from one union, crown die back (not near the line), heavy limb inclusion, discolouration that could be bleeding canker and possibly a girdling root, as there appears to be no basal flare on one side.

 

That's from seeing a picture and not investigating properly... It's not all I can see either, but as there are ribbons wrapped round it, I can't make out how bad the reactive wood that goes from the bottom upwards is.

 

And finally, to answer why they haven't fitted new lines through the tree, that pole is an 'open point', it's a separate circuit!

 

I also see problems that are indirect to that trees failure, root compaction, from what I see it looks like a popular place for people to sit and walk around. It also has Guignardia leaf blotch which won't directly cause a tree to decline but if the tree is slightly struggling leaf blotch won't help the situation specially when the tree needs as much energy as it can get and you factor in what eddy has said this certainly won't help.

Posted

You also have to think about the future it's either going to fail or get bigger then fail that's what chestnuts do, it's not a woodland area where you can let nature to decide its course.

Basically it's a bit selfish trying to prolong the enivitable when you can fell, grind and plant something a bit more suitable in its place (away from the Powerline so it doesn't get pruned/interfered/ ruin it's form)

Posted
.............. It also has Guignardia leaf blotch which won't directly cause a tree to decline but if the tree is slightly struggling leaf blotch won't help the situation specially when the tree needs as much energy as it can get and you factor in what eddy has said this certainly won't help.

 

Hello CJM,

 

Which image (or images) have you identified Guignardia from?

 

 

 

 

.

Posted
Hello CJM,

 

Which image (or images) have you identified Guignardia from?

 

 

 

 

.

 

The newspaper has uploaded quite a few picture on their Facebook page.

image.jpg.89795d983093980d32b5f487f2ecd075.jpg

Posted
The newspaper has uploaded quite a few picture on their Facebook page.

 

Thanks

 

Think it's worth saying that the image shows the leaf mines from Cameraria ohridella (the chestnut leaf miner) not the fungal leaf blotch of Guignardia aesculi.

 

 

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.