Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Roundup - safe to drink (if you want cancer).


Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Not really surprising imo. And just like car producing companies (or gun companies) trying to keep the safety obligations as low as possible, there will always be lobbies. Just like chainsaw companies try/tried to hold off the environment changes, strato saws. Just as damaging, just harder to see a link (at this time).

 

By the way, glyphosate is used in a ton load of other products too, and as long as we keep buying it, cuz it just works better than most alternatives, it will be available. Maybe in smaller portions and it will be prohibited somewhere in the future, but that will still take ages.

 

Same story for a lot of medicines (that are freely available), they turn out to be just as bad. The same for x-rays. I don't know if they advise women to get scans for breast cancer in the UK, but there are studies showing that the scanning can just as well cause cancers for cells that are genetically more receptive for it.

Posted
When I worked in Canada for a farmer spraying with the stuff; he said a rep used to drink it neat as proof how safe it was! Funny reps never came back??

 

there was a rep in the uk that used to do that to. I don't hes around either

Posted

History repeating itself. Will we ever learn?

 

In Bill Brysons book "A BRIEF HISTORY OF EVERYTHING" he mentions when lead became industrial in a big way, the factories that made it had people keeling over and dying in large numbers.

A Dr drank some lead solution and they analysed his waste, no lead in it.

They didn't realise at the time, the body absorbs lead and keeps it! It took nearly a century to get it out of petrol, paint etc.

 

Trust no manufacturer.

Posted

Certainly agree that the revolving door in USA and here stinks. But you haven't posted a link for a revolving door into Scientific American who published the article that looked rationally at the evidence.

Posted

I don't remotely trust chemical companies.

 

A good friend ran a firm that would independently test chemicals before release onto the market. He did one study that showed that a particular product was very harmful to beneficial insects. He wrote his report and sent it off to them. They came back and basically said rewrite it changing the facts or we will never give you work again! This was the final straw for him so gave up working in the industry. Got loads more horror stories from him on how they operate and it ain't pretty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.