Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Daft and irritating terminology used in this industry


Goaty
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As a far eastern import to this fair (?) Isle, I continue to be annoyed by the use of the word "dike" when one means ditch.

A dike is a body of earth to defend against water, often the creation of one would result in there being a ditch beside one....

 

Think about it, little Dutch boys put their fingers in dikes to save the country, not just dangle them in some water.

 

 

Dike is a word I only use when describing lesbians...which I got into trouble for recently from the 21 yr old who works for me. Two lesbian friends happily use the term but apparently not all dikes.....sorry.......lesbians are happy with it.

 

BUT...and this is the point of this post (so to speak) I would just like to say a thank you to Rover for the above post...I had never thought of the dikes being the banks created to defend against water rather than the watercourse itself. I'm going to annoy people with that later:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loath the steady degradation of words in my lifetime, you can see it happening and no-one cares except that I do because we are left temporarily without a distinction between two words meaning and permanently without a clear meaning for one or both of them.

 

There's obvious things like 'awesome', which in my day meant filling one with awe (wonderment ). Now it means nothing.

 

But there's the housebuilder's favourite 'home'. Used to mean an integerated household, the secure environment created by a family or group. The word for a residential building, freestanding or detached, was 'house'. Now Barratt build homes, it's not the people that move into their flimsy structures that build the home. Marketing people are the worst, they will bastardise anything to make a sale.

 

Next up is 'impact', which I still say is a sudden, damaging, encounter. 99% of the time the right word would be (and used to be) 'effect'. But that's not dynamic enough for news stories. Yet you will still hear about the 'impact' of global warming on trees.

 

I'll get back in my box now. My dad used to chide me decades ago for using 'brilliant' to mean anything other than 'emitting or reflecting intense light'.

 

Whatever!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on a roll now! Pet hate for me is 'pollarding'. Originally meant coppicing above ground level to keep grazing animals away from the regrowth. The right word for reducing tree in height was 'polling'. Now pollarding is just a fancy and meaningless word for topping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.