Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Compulsory drugs testing


arbogrunt
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Of course its legal to smoke dope in Amsterdam in coffee shops, which adds a new dimension. Ketamine is used for short surgery ops On expeditions. It's sold openly in chemists in the Himalayas. Course it might be out of your system well before a spot check back at work.

So the actual drug check is flawed. The guys I know who do trees on the rail, have spot checks

 

Personally I'd like to see idiot testing on a regular basis. Would be more effective in combating accidents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

just over a year ago when i was breaking into the arb industry, the first company i worked for 10 outta 12 guys in it smoked weed, from the second they stepped into the yard in the morning till when they got into their car at the end of the day. i worked as a groundie for a while, but was allowed to climb every now and then. i didnt feel safe at all when i knew the 3 guys on the ground were stoned and i didnt have a clue what i was doing in the tree. my boss didnt smoke, but loved 3-5 cans at the end of the day, befor driving me back. i remember one time we all got back to the yard, he drunk about 6 cans, got and emergency call out, then drove 3 of u down the M25 to a job an hour away. needless to say im not working in that company any more, and have almost finished the first year of my ND course at merrist wood, which has taught me the importance of saftey in this industry. in future i will be doing trial periods with companys for my peice of mind rather than theirs.

 

and i used to smoke massive amounts but quit 2 yeas ago after a week period of constant panic attacks, this is one of the reasons i wanted to get into tree work, to be incontoll of my fear, lucky for me it worked and im the most happy iv been in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what else would you call somone who has smoked a spliff? i would have used "...i didnt feel safe at all when i knew the 3 guys on the ground were slightly altered due to their synapses miscomunicating because to the level of THC in their system" but thought stoned fit the bill pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont have a problem with people who smoke weed in genral, its just i think their is a time and a place. i wouldnt be happy with somone groundsmaning for me if i knew he wasnt right, but i would feel the same about if he was pretty ill that day. like somone has said befor, tree work is dangerous enough as it is, adding recreational drugs into the mix isnt gonna improve injury/death stats is it. just gives health and saftey more reason to make all tree work carried out from a MEWP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped on Nov 11 1987. Prior to that had smoked morning nnoon and night for the previuos 6 or 7 year's, yyes I was mellow in the various jobs I did during that period of time, including electro plating (with conc sulphuric acid), demolition for Ivor Rich (Perched on I beam's with pneumatic drills breaking concrete floor's 8 story's up-no harness's or even H&S back then) :scared:, security work (just at the time when the IRA blew up harrod's) :scared:, gawd knows how I managed to only have 2 bike crashes and escaped srious injury or death. It was the invincibilty factor that bothers me now thinking about weed use, I still get nasty flash back's of a time when me and a mate run at full speed along the parapet of a 7 story building when we were on a buzz, one gust of wind and we'd have been history.

I've never been up a tree stoned, or with another stoned chainsaw user, but have sinceworked in various scenario's with folks who were using hash/weed, or a pallet fixer who used speed (he was scary especially when the nail gun's were flashing about). Several did get the push including fork lift driver's, and I believe that was down to someone else in management objecting, not a test; official company policy with one (large american) company was drug or alcohol use at work was an instant sackable offense. Should there be a test? If it works equally and fairly, fine, but things being what they are folk will no doubt devise ways and means to dodge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should there be a test? If it works equally and fairly, fine, but things being what they are folk will no doubt devise ways and means to dodge.

 

The dodging is very true, but equally the testing would be woefully inacurate and unfair. The only way to police it will be by not working with or employing `stoned' people as opposed to people who smoke in down time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.