Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

What a shame, you'd hope the NT wouldn't have made such a decision lightly. Be interesting to know under what circumstances the extensive decay was found, and see a cross section of the stump. I know these reports should be read with a large dose of salt, but - an expert says only 5% live wood remaining? A second opinion wouldn't have gone amiss, when an historic 200 year old tree is irreplaceable...

Posted

"The National Trust said the 'landmark' tree had to be felled immediately after experts found there was only five per cent live wood left in trunk"

 

"........recently surviving the 'roughest storm in 30 years"

 

Mmmmm :001_rolleyes:

 

 

Certainly would be interesting to see a cross section

 

 

& a partial monolith being left for the long associated biodiversity would of been a good touch.

 

.

Posted

I've got no problem whatsoever with removing dangerous trees in public areas, but in this case I think there were other alternatives. Perhaps fenced off to just beyond the drip line.

Posted
I've got no problem whatsoever with removing dangerous trees in public areas, but in this case I think there were other alternatives. Perhaps fenced off to just beyond the drip line.

 

Completely agree, Its a shame they didnt apply this common sense approach Marc.

Posted

Everyone's always quick to point the finger at other peoples tree management. I don't imagine they took the decision lightly. Maybe they have jumped the gun a little, I wouldn't know as I haven't surveyed it. I would be interested to see their workings though. There's a great deal of difference between 5% live wood and 5% remaining residual wall. I've seen quite a few stories in the Mail and the Express that slag organisations off for felling trees, then all the arm-chair experts come out.

Posted

I was subbing to a crew in lymington and they told me it was on the local news that jo hedger of arbor venture, unless they miss read the landys sign writing, that was taking the cedar down maybe someone that knows her can get a photo or 2 of the decay if it was arbor venture.

Posted

I should think Knighton countryside management will get this job. Or uptons. Not sure if any of those guys are on here to get some pics when the jobs done.

 

 

Sent using

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.