Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Sustainability of Wood as a fuel??


cessna
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why the hell do we have to keep re-inventing the wheel?

We had this great system called coppice with standards everyone was happy then someone went abroad saw the dollar signs and came back with modern day forestry. It works for 20 years, everyone forgets how much it cost to plant and keep the trees alive, the market drops and everyone scratches their heads for 10 years wondering what to do with the wonder tree, then a new grant funded market develops, we flood that the rubbish that should be better used elsewhere till the price drops, then we scratch our heads again.

 

The firewood price has gone too high already some people are already choosing between food and fuel!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we burned all the wood that was available and forgot the snobby "hardwood" is the only good wood, we would be sufficient and sustainable.

 

all timber as long as it is not treated, and has been dryed enough, forget the word seasoned as this can cause confusion over different time periods, some wood "dries" quicker than others, take larch or spruce if run through a nokka processor or harvestor the rollers puncture the stems and the timber dries in next to no time.

 

there is alot of myth put about by people who keep instilling into customers minds that only hardwood is best, only 3 year seasoned is best, rubbish - if you had some birch sat their for 2 years it would be mush.

 

all wood will burn, if priced accordingly to how quick it burns then wood can compete against many fuels (i.e. we sell arb logs, mixed up tree surgery wood for as little as £45 cubic metre, larch sells for £60 cubic metre) all acceptable woods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In April, we are going to plant 2 acres/2000 eucalyptus trees for firewood. In some trials in Kent, they were big enough to thin for firewood after 4 years. if all goes well we will then look at planting about another 15-20 acres of them. Quick growing, hardwood and lovely smelling firewood. Looking forward to it already:thumbup:

Woodworm,

I read you post last night and it sounds like a plan. It occurred to me today that there is obviously a reason that you are due to plant in April, later than you would ideal plant many species. Eucalyptus are sensitive to frost and I guess this is the reason. My concern is that April has been the driest and warmest month here for a couple of years and this may require attention. How much watering do you envisage doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I planted my Eucalyptus trees in May 2007 and they are doing very well, I feel that i could probably have planted them deeper than 2 foot though as the height they achieve in a short period of time is quite amazing! Thankfully i did at least put a 5 foot fence post in with them so i have been able to tie them up while the root system strengthed grew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we burned all the wood that was available and forgot the snobby "hardwood" is the only good wood, we would be sufficient and sustainable.

 

all timber as long as it is not treated, and has been dryed enough, forget the word seasoned as this can cause confusion over different time periods, some wood "dries" quicker than others, take larch or spruce if run through a nokka processor or harvestor the rollers puncture the stems and the timber dries in next to no time.

 

there is alot of myth put about by people who keep instilling into customers minds that only hardwood is best, only 3 year seasoned is best, rubbish - if you had some birch sat their for 2 years it would be mush.

 

all wood will burn, if priced accordingly to how quick it burns then wood can compete against many fuels (i.e. we sell arb logs, mixed up tree surgery wood for as little as £45 cubic metre, larch sells for £60 cubic metre) all acceptable woods.

Quite agree, have done a hard sell on the S/W now for 3 yrs, people just need educating, and they are happy with what they buy. I get sick of H/W is better, NO it just burns slightly longer and is more expensive, and NOT sustainable.

PS found this link in local NE paper last night Stop Burning Our Trees

which is anti our timber being used as bio mass for electricity, not firewood, interesting site. If anyone has the journal its my husband on the opposite page with the chainsaw!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.