Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Fairly sure that’s not illegal. Someone correct me, stating some law if I’m wrong. 

Edited by AHPP

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
2 hours ago, AHPP said:

Fairly sure that’s not illegal. Someone correct me, stating some law if I’m wrong. 


After a bit of searching go it would appear it isn’t illegal but not necessary ethical.

 

Seems to change depending on the area or the FAO.

 

I know in the North East if you applied for a .17hmr specified for Fox control trip it would be knocked back.  At least in Teeside it was.

 

 

WWW.THESTALKINGDIRECTORY.CO.UK

I understand that here in Essex they don't deem the .17hmr suitable for foxes & that you can't get it on your...

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I’ve been fancying a .22 Hornet recently. The thinking man’s HMR. Importantly,

rimmed. There’s a thread on the American Single Shot Rifle Association forum of bloke called Bailey Bradshaw making an absolute sweetheart of a Hornet double rifle. 

  • Like 2
Posted

22lr or 223 personally, hornet is going to be expensive to feed as it's an oddball and you won't be gaining much especially when you can get surplus 223 cheap.

 

Was pushing 125m with the 22lr the other day and keeping it around 4", need a bigger gong to push 150-200.

 

You soon get bored with 17, it's too bloody loud but amazing watching it explode on a steel gong.

Posted

I don't have guns now, but I started with a .22 Win Mag rifle, hoping it would be cheap to run, and big enough for foxes. Ammunition wasn't widely stocked, which made it a pain. It was accurate, and would stop small things at over a hundred yards easily, in fact it had the same energy at a hundred yards as a .22lr had just leaving the barrel. 

It stopped every fox I hit with it, but it just wasn't powerful enough for that.  The .223 which I added to the arsenal solved that problem.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Rich Rule said:


After a bit of searching go it would appear it isn’t illegal but not necessary ethical.

 

Seems to change depending on the area or the FAO.

 

The current guidance states you can be granted 17HMR for fox. I know some forces may be reluctant but you could argue your case...

 

2 hours ago, GarethM said:

22lr or 223 personally, hornet is going to be expensive to feed as it's an oddball and you won't be gaining much especially when you can get surplus 223 cheap.

 

Can you still get cheap .223 milsurp? Down here it isn't cheap any more, and I wouldnt use it on foxes.

Edited by Paul in the woods
Posted

You argue for 17 mostly as it's a close quarter calibre and fragments easily so ricochet is less of an issue.

 

Personally it's more the lack of size of the entry and your relying on fragmentation and placement.

 

Providing your not after match quality, you can pickup millsurp or cheap 223/556 for less than £1.50 each.

 

Countryman derby is £17 per 30 or £44 for 50

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.