Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, well i've never reduced a pine tree in my time as a climber. Felled, deadwooded many, reduced the odd limb etc. I saw a picture on here but cannot find it again of a Scotts pine which had been completely reduced. Just wondering if anyone has done alot of reductions on pines? If so what kind of future managment do you recommend? And what lead you to decision, etc.:001_smile:

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
a Scotts pine which had been completely reduced.

 

Surely "completely reduced" means "removed"?????????????:confused1:

 

Are you talking "topped"???????????

 

25% reduction?????????????

 

50% reduction?????????

 

IME, you must leave a fair amount of foliage or it will die.

Posted

Did a line of leaning mature Corsicans. TO wanted c30/40% and managed to get away with c20%. Combined it with a v light thin.

 

Trees looked good at the time and still do.

Posted

The decurrent habit of mature Scots lend itself a bit more naturally IMO, you can usually find one of those nice points where a parallell secondary branch rolls over the primary.

 

Reductions should be avoided on anything excurrent, right? Especially those with opposite budding - even the best reduction looks poor.

Posted
The decurrent habit of mature Scots lend itself a bit more naturally IMO, you can usually find one of those nice points where a parallell secondary branch rolls over the primary.

 

Reductions should be avoided on anything excurrent, right? Especially those with opposite budding - even the best reduction looks poor.

 

I would agree but don't some conifers tend to lose their apical dominance or at least lessen as they mature thereby becoming 'better candidates' for reduction if necessary?

Posted
I would agree but don't some conifers tend to lose their apical dominance or at least lessen as they mature thereby becoming 'better candidates' for reduction if necessary?

 

Absolutely. A reduction on a young Scots would look just as bad as one on a mature Norway Spruce or Turkish Hazel!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.