Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Vespasian said:

spoken like a humorless numpty... get back in ya cage so I can throw a banana at ya...

I apoligise you seem to have taken it the wrong way, it wasn't meant as humour 

  • Like 2

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Shigo comes along and we all change practice: Mattheck comes along and we change a little: someone else puts in their penn'orth and we take another look.

 

Move along another 100 years (assuming we're still here) and we've changed again.  The truth is we'll never fully understand.  The tree will reduce itself if it needs to so best not to go sit under one :-)

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, Graham said:

The truth is we'll never fully understand.

We can put a man on the moon, supposedly, but there is an awful lot about the natural world that we don't yet, and maybe never will, completely understand.

 

"The tree will reduce itself if it needs to" - being pedantic, a tree will fail if external forces exceed its structural strength. Although there is some thought that shedding parts to prevent the loss of the whole in extreme weather may be an inherited survival mechanism/evolutionary trait.

Edited by Gary Prentice
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, nath said:

I apoligise you seem to have taken it the wrong way, it wasn't meant as humour 

No I didn't imagine it was, seeing as you have none...

Posted

I'd love to see the wind machine to test this theory on a mature beech tree.

 

To be honest I think this makes sense but as others have said the theory is based on a young tree which needs the trunk to be supple. If I saw a trunk bending like that on a 200 year old tree I'd be running away.

 

 The only thing I will say that I find is early mentioned to customers i fear is that once you reduce that tree you will have it coming back denser and with more sail effect in 2-6 years time then you will be reducing it again.

 

 Sorry if I have missed the point I have only just scanned the article but will look at in in the week when I have a bit more time, I am quite interested.

Posted

Definately against the crap reductions I often see. Time pressures and ignorance produce them. Looking at the AA article on pollen reduction in cities was enlightening. So sometimes bash the big buggers out has its merits , K

Posted
On 09/06/2018 at 07:49, Gary Prentice said:

You could always ask!  I'll hide behind you, while you tell him that Frank Rinn say he's wrong! :D

 

 

....I WOULD have , Gary , but as you may have noticed - He does carry a big stick ! K

 

( ...and knows how to use it :P )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.