Loony Lefties

[Mick Dempsey]

Qui

Just now, eggsarascal said:

....... And the left are the looneys!

Quite so.

[eggsarascal]

3 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

Qui

Quite so.

I'm not having a good day of it. The Loonies might have been better.

 

Not sure which way to take the second bit.

[Khriss]

Well- ten yrs of Austerity in UK , ( yea climbers .. look in yr wallets ! ) now to be followed by ten yrs of picking up the pieces  of Brexit fiascoe , I think a nice cardy n beard may be our only hope - as opposed to wrinkled ranty One who Must Be Obeyed ( when possible ) K

[Mick Dempsey]

I don’t like Diane Abbot, I think she’s incompetent at best.

 

But to have a thread about the ‘loony left’ where the sort of stuff that’s being posted about her on this thread is beyond irony.

 

 

[forestboy1978]

11 minutes ago, eggsarascal said:

....... And the left are the looneys!

Yeah mate I obv didn't actually mean it, jesus.. 

 

FYI I almost never comment on how a person looks in actuality.. but when they're a dumb a shit, racist, hypocrite who happens to be butt ugly I make an exception..

[eggsarascal]

4 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

I don’t like Diane Abbot, I think she’s incompetent at best.

 

But to have a thread about the ‘loony left’ where the sort of stuff that’s being posted about her on this thread is beyond irony.

 

 

I told you I was having a bad day....... I find myself agreeing with you.......

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

On 17 January 2018 at 21:27, woody paul said:

Local council and government are allowing all these new houses to be built and the NHS hospitals are not big enough to take all the people moving in to area. 1 answer maybe a percentage of what building company buys land for is put in to NHS just a thought.  

Those mechanisms are already in place by virtue of section 106 or CIL tariffs.  CIL is intended to replace the abymally administered s106 fiasco but it's implementation is 'optional' for adoption according to the desire of the LA....  What could possibly go wrong....?  

[eggsarascal]

5 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Those mechanisms are already in place by virtue of section 106 or CIL tariffs.  CIL is intended to replace the abymally administered s106 fiasco but it's implementation is 'optional' for adoption according to the desire of the LA....  What could possibly go wrong....?  

Abymally! More water with it, Mr Johnson.

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

2 minutes ago, eggsarascal said:

Abymally! More water with it, Mr Johnson.

Multi-tasking Mr E!  70/30 focus on shredding the policies and spending of the PC v reading AT.  Somethings gotta give!  

[onetruth]

I just watched the Peterson interview.  I hadn't heard of the guy before but he seems to talk a lot of sense.  As for the interviewer (also unknown to me - is it channel 4?), it was clear that she just hadn't prepared for the interview.  I got the impression that she was expecting a rather different interviewee and was unable to adjust her approach.  It sounded like she wasn't really listening to the answers given.  To be fair, he was an unusual interviewee - she's probably more used to interviewees who carefully craft their responses to sound good, whereas this guy was careful to be precise.  She was desperate to get a statement of controversy.  That said, 2 million views suggests she did her job well! 

 

I'll put my neck on the line in defence of Dianne Abbott, not that I particularly like her, but I think the criticism of her here is a bit distasteful.  Fair enough: she has some extravagantly leftist policy ambitions, she certainly doesn't interview well, and she can on occasion seem a little bit fundamentalist.  But she is, in my opinion, one of the more sincere politicians we have at the moment.  And she has been pretty active (in terms of parliamentary work) throughout her time as an MP.  I wouldn't want her running the exchequer, but I'm glad she's an MP.  Most successful politicians are corrupt self-serving narcissists.       

Edited January 22, 2018 by onetruth