Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Basically it is a stack measurement  , volume of space occupied rather than volume of actual material ...... it was long before metric cubes or before there was any practical way of weighing the wood .. I guess the system was taken to America where it has evolved in to slightly different calculations , bit like gallons ...

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, sime42 said:

 


Which Jeff Jepson book was that from Lucky eleven? I'm a big fan of his but don't remember that bit in any of the three books of his I have.

 

'To fell a tree'

Posted
2 hours ago, Vespasian said:

Since I was a lad I've never come across a cord, only on a utube vid by americans or canandians have I seen reference to a cord, so obviously I've no idea what a cord is other than a guess.. which I imagined was something along the lines of two or three dumpy bags worth of uncut firewood..

 

So no, now I know what a cord is, 4*4*8 of uncut wood I won't be arguing that the definition is rubbish...  

 

Though I might add, it seems odd that one cord of wood might be somewhat less than another cord of wood.. best change selling cord to a measure of weight, qualifying it by being dry or wet..   soft or hard..  

 

 

 

 

When you were a lad I expect I was already about 50 . :(

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Stubby said:

When you were a lad I expect I was already about 50 . :(

when I was a lad we burned coal, not sure how much that dates me but I'll hazard a guess you're not past hundred yet..

Posted
41 minutes ago, Vespasian said:

when I was a lad we burned coal, not sure how much that dates me but I'll hazard a guess you're not past hundred yet..

No . I am 65 in Jan . My Dad is 93 .

Posted
1 minute ago, MonsterMonster said:

Okay, so the consensus seems to be that cordwood is not a thing in reality but rather a loosely used term for "wood only suitable for processing into firewood usually straight'ish, not overly large in diameter."

However ... from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordwood_construction

 

"... in which 'cordwood' or short pieces of debarked tree ..."

No . Its a 4"X4"x8" stack FFS

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Stubby said:

No . Its a 4"X4"x8" stack FFS

I don't think anyone's disputing the technical meaning but when people ask for a load of cordwood most people understand it to mean unprocessed timber, it's just become a quick way of saying that in the right context. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.