Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

That tree looks more like a 90' to 100' height more so than 150' after pausing earlier in the video, and later at 1:04.

 

Its got plenty of meat on its bones though. Thats one of my favorite genus.

 

:001_smile:

Posted

I thought the same Mario, did'nt look 150" to me. I must be cynical, because I did'nt find it particularly impressive, just looked like lots of backbreaking work. I would have insisted on a crane, and brought it down in merchantable lengths.

Posted
I thought the same Mario, did'nt look 150" to me. I must be cynical, because I did'nt find it particularly impressive, just looked like lots of backbreaking work. I would have insisted on a crane, and brought it down in merchantable lengths.

 

I thought it was a good video. Bearing in mind how difficult it can be getting a crane into MOST sites, how do you guys know that "insisting" on a crane would have been even possible?

 

You have to presume that these guys are a fairly efficient crew, therefore I am sure it was done in the most efficient way possible.

 

Doug Blease

  • Like 1
Posted

There was a road right below the site. I would have got a road closure, put a 100 tonne crane in and been done in a day. A long time ago, I did a very similar tree a 130" high sempivirens, in a very similar steep roadside situation. With a 35 tonne crane cribbed up on the road, we had it down in 2 hours. ( must scan the pics I have of that job)

 

And I dont think slabbing a tree of that size down in such small blocks is particularly efficient.

Posted
There was a road right below the site. I would have got a road closure, put a 100 tonne crane in and been done in a day. A long time ago, I did a very similar tree a 130" high sempivirens, in a very similar steep roadside situation. With a 35 tonne crane cribbed up on the road, we had it down in 2 hours. ( must scan the pics I have of that job)

 

And I dont think slabbing a tree of that size down in such small blocks is particularly efficient.

 

Totally agree. Was a great vid but as you say the crane would have been the better option IMO! All that hand balling of the timber would have taken ages and cost £££££'s. Much more efficient lifting it off and into a trailer or flat deck.

Posted
Whatever the crane situation, I personally thought it was an incredible waste of good timber :001_smile:

 

150ft ?? Must have been worth a good amount

 

Meant to put that in my first post, very good point. My dining table is made from sequoia, very nice timber.

Posted

My post is not meant to denigrate the obvious skill shown in the video, of that there is no doubt. Its just I've done a few of these, and I dislike endless slabbing down of short lumps on ropes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.